User talk:Gabtreats

Gabby' talk page - welcome! Love, Gab

June 2020

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/7 July 2005 London bombings (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus (2012 film) are disruptive. You should work on creating content and reading policy prior to nominating another article for deletion. Eostrix (talk) 14:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus (2012 film)

I recommend that you gain some more knowledge about the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion process and the standards people use in that process before nominating any more articles for deletion. Nominating an obviously notable film for deletion ... when the article is of such quality as to be a featured article ... is disruptive and discredits you as an editor. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gabtreats, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Gabtreats! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020: "How I can right my wrongs"?

Hi. Your first "wrong" was to want to be involved in Articles for deletion. How you decided to become involved in that process is something other Wikipedia editors are eager to find out, so please tell us why you are motivated to delete articles from Wikipedia. You may be the only Wikipedia editor in recorded history whose sole desire is to delete articles.

My guess would be that, ultimately, you intend to remove certain articles from this encyclopedia. You are unlikely to achieve that goal. Everything editors do on Wikipedia is watchable by other editors, at all times. No matter how long you stay on Wikipedia, a recommendation by you (or any other editor) that an article be deleted is going to be subject to extensive discussion and scrutiny. If you thought you would be able to worm your way in to an influential position at Wikipedia and "have your way with it", I have to inform you that absolutely nobody has, or ever will have, such wiki-powers.

You do not seem to be here to make an encyclopedia. On that basis, I recommend that you not edit Wikipedia going forward.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Juliette Han per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juliette Han. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=I once again want to apologize to Juliette Han and Mz7 for my mistakes.. I will do my best not to make them further. ~~~~}}

. Mz7 (talk) 21:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I once again want to apologize to Juliette Han and Mz7 for my mistakes.. I will do my best not to make them further. Gabtreats (talk) 22:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gabtreats (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I once again want to apologize to Juliette Han and Mz7 for my mistakes.. I will do my best not to make them further. Gabtreats (talk) 22:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 10:37, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.