User talk:Gabor Laufer

Welcome.

Hello, Gabor Laufer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. -- Jeandré, 2010-08-22t12:39z

Proposed deletion of Intellectual Decathlon

The article Intellectual Decathlon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since February and it looks from the editing as if there are no verifiable, reliable, published, 3rd party sources. Possible conflict of interest.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Jeandré, 2010-08-22t12:45z 12:45, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Intellectual Decathlon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intellectual Decathlon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectual Decathlon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Jeandré, 2011-03-14t22:39z 22:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]