User talk:Gabeyc

Stop doubting me!

Please stop saying that user:Gabeyc is my puppet! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabeyg (talk • contribs)

IOrange should be true article, but administrator are too quick in not caring..

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gabeyc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Making IOrange again is because it is true article and well, my friend told me about this case.

Decline reason:

No unblock reason provided. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gabeyc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Also, this block is not fair because it is based on bias information only by looking one article or assuming sock puppetry. (By the way, sock is also very rude word if to use in real life.)

Decline reason:

No unblock reason provided. Allegations of sockpuppetry have been discussed in previous versions of this talk page and also in the unblock request below. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also..

Release the block at least for my user page. It's illegal to hurt other people's areas although Wikipedia rules say.

Also..

Many administrator is not always good at checking or knowing the article.

Unblock..

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gabeyc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

By the way, I'm not sockpuppet of Gabeyg.

Decline reason:

The two contribution histories (including attempts to (re)create IOrange) seem to disagree with your claim. If a checkuser has not been run, I recommend doing so to allay this once and for all. Until then, request denied. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, please do not abuse the unblock template. Repeated abuse will result in protection of this talk page. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Since you chose to abuse the unblock template (replacing my review of the last one with an unreviewed template), I have protected this page to prevent further abuse. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gabeyc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No noise is going'round. I was proven innocent, therefore I should be released. Also Iorange backrupted, and got dead sentence, so no need argue for creating that article. Best of all, I have to admit that I supported gabeyg too much, and i'm sorry to NawlinWiki, but not to Nlu; Nlu has to be removed from admin since he/she is not keeping accepting different POV and being NPOV.

Decline reason:

Your reasons do not persuade me that you are likely to make useful edits, and neither do your edits below, in which you place a false unblocked template and a message with a forged signature. — FisherQueen (Talk) 12:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): reason Request handled by: Gabeyc 10:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block him? He made good edits! Mathbot 23:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)This edit was actually made by Gabeyc.[reply]