User talk:Gabel1960

Welcome!

Hello, Gabel1960, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 09:56, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Enlargement of NATO may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of NATO. According to former President [Michail Sergejewitsch Gorbatschow|Michail Gorbatschows]] promises were given to him by ministers of foreign relations, especially [[Hans-Dietrich Genscher]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:56, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tagesschau (Germany) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* 2014: [Eyes and Ears Award]] for the new studio design, animations and grafic techniques.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Studienrat (Germany)

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Gabel1960, thanks for creating Studienrat (Germany)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease address the tagged issue(s). See: WP:CITE for more information,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samuel Mitja Rapoport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gabel1960. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gabel1960. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Rainer Mausfeld (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Power, Control, Empiric and Mystification

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ten commandments of propaganda) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ten commandments of propaganda.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A useful article. When you translate an article from another language Wikipedia, you should provide attribution on the talk page. I have done this.in this instance, but another time, you can add it yourself.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page HMS Sheffield (D80) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Lyndaship (talk) 11:20, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Lyndaship. My first edit was reverted because of allegedly inappropriate sourcing (German "tabloid" Stern (magazine). This, interestingly, you did not find inappropriate, why?. In my revert I inserted a new source: an article from The Guardian, into the edit summary. It is obvious that this is clear enough to be easily understood as saying: If you do not like Stern, perhaps you accept the Guardian. The fellow Wikipedian reverted again (complete revert) without any reason. If you look at the context, you will understand what happened. Interestingly again, now, after the second revert, you are coming along, claiming lack of appropriate edit summary. This smells of something like a concerted action, I am sorry to say. The whole article is a mix of technical jargon, conceit and leaving out of unpleasant facts: In the article you will find hints at deficiencies on the ship, but their detailed descritption, which si int the official report, are left out (on purpose?). Instead of that you get pseudo-precise descriptions of technicalities. This is not in line with WP's policy, and not in the interest of our readers. Kind regards, --Gabel1960 (talk) 12:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your engagement. May I first remind you of WP:AGF and I look forward to your retraction of your unwarranted claim of concerted action between myself and Wee Curry Monster. I reverted you as you reinserted claims sourced to the German tabloid while giving a different source in your edit summary which is misleading. If you put the claims back into the article but correctly sourced to the Guardian and gave an appropriate edit summary I would not have reverted you. You can still do that. You are also welcome to challenge anything in the article and to add missing information you think is correct or appropriate using reliable sources. Fair enough? Lyndaship (talk) 13:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's very fair, Lyndaship. I formally retract my hint at the possibility of a concerted action, it has never be a factual claim ("smell" can be rather subjective). Apart from that it has never been my intention to behave in an impolite manner towards you as a person. My impression was you were instrumentalized, but also this is not a claim. I really do not know for sure. It is only very strange to me that you came along after the second revert. In the German WP this happens mostly when somebody is "called in for help". Perhaps in enWP this has become a regular procedure in some sections of WP. I no not know. If this is wrong, I apologize. On the other hand, it is not forbidden to call for help, either. Sometimes it can be done for the wrong reason, that's the point. I will use the Guardian article as you have proposed. Thanks for being so positive. Kind regards, --

Thank you. I don't know the German wiki but here there is such a thing as a watchlist which can be used to notify you of any changes to any article you have placed on it. I tend to add every article I have ever edited to it so your edit appeared then WCM's revert and then your revision hence my interest. There is also a tool which enables an editor to see any articles on which two editors have overlapped on, if you put myself and WCM in I think you will find that we have disagreed on some articles content so no, I'm not his cavalry and there is no collusion. Happy editing Lyndaship (talk) 13:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As Lynda has pointed out, we have often disagreed but have always resolved matters amicably through discussion. The Stern article is utter crap, claiming the ship was lost to a chip pan fire. I have no problem with using the Guardian up to a point but academic sources would be preferable. I don’t think your claim of facts being suppressed is sustainable. Finally I would suggest you should not be editing if you, as you appear to be, are here to right great wrongs.W C M_email 13:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the best would be to use the second report. The Stern and the Guardian refer to it, so it must be open to public, but I could not find it on the internet. I am not here to right great wrongs, I was reading something historical, went to the article to get deeper information, and found that, contrary to my expectation, an important part of information was missing. The Stern, by the way, is no tabloid, in the German wikipedia it is a reputable source, not the best one, of course, but acceptable. The Guardian is a reputable source beyond any doubt. If you disagree and think there is different information in academic sources, you can always quote from them. Even better, as I said before, would be the report itself. Kind regards,--Gabel1960 (talk) 23:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] It's already linked in the main article. Given the primary source is available, I'd see no need to refer to a German tabloid whose author appears to have plucked the chip pan theory out of thin air (no other source I'm aware of has made such a claim). I'm not sure what you think was missing, since most of what you've referred to was already mentioned. The only detail you've added is the missile penetrated to the galley. Best. W C M_email 12:00, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can live without the Stern, if you are happy with the text as it is now, I find nothing to complain, either.Gabel1960 (talk) 12:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eurocampus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eurocampus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 03:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Butter moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michael Butter, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 20:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Butter

Hello, Gabel1960. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Butter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:14, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gunnar Kaiser for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gunnar Kaiser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunnar Kaiser (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 09:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing quote

Greetings! I'm attempting to improve the Gunnar Kaiser article that you wrote, but I'm confused by the quote in the second paragraph of the Positions and Criticisms section. The quote has a beginning " but it's not clear where the quote ends. Would you be willing to put in the missing " to add clarify? Benevolent human (talk) 14:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 14:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will look into it. At the moment I see no violation. Was the quote too long? Gabel1960 (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whataboutism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manipulation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User Notifications

User Notifications. User is noticed repeatedly whitewash german right-wing - politics - extremist articles. 62.202.180.235 (talk) 12:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for this notification. Can this allegation be more specific? If my contributions are seen like that, why isn|t is discussed on the discussion page of the respective articles? I do have an alternative view on lots of matters, but, as far as I know, inside the limits set by the basic rights of opinion and expression. I am certainly not an unbiased person; I do not know anybody without a perspective, interests and a bias. My political perspective is on the liberal left, not far from Democracy Now. As for Russia and Ukraine I heavily rely on Mearsheimer and Cohen. Wikipedia is a project of mass intelligence to balance out individual deficiencies by the participation of different persons, and the guiding principles is provable facts from reliable sources. Plurality/pluralism are the catchwords here. I don't find the spirit of Wikipedia in such a comment as in the above. Can you be more specific about "noticed repeatedly", by whom, when and in which articles? Gabel1960 (talk) 02:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whataboutism

You are using Wikipedia:Citation templates with sections and formats that are not supported in the English Wikipedia. Please familiarize yourself for the future. Best regards. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on European International School Manila

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page European International School Manila, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Hipal (talk) 18:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Sachs

Can you please use the article talk page to discuss the changes that you'd like to make? --Hipal (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeffrey Sachs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tikun Olam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]