User talk:Gabbylexy/sandbox

Lead section: The lead section is understandable and summarizes the articles main points. The intro outlines the purpose of an occupational therapist and defines the roles they have in the health care system. The lead section also gives a brief and short overview of what sort of clients an occupational therapist works with.

Structure: The article is well organized with appropriate headings and subheadings. The article works in chronological order of history with the information provided in the article. The article starts with the overview, then history, philosophy, areas of practice and so forth. Each heading title is appropriately labeled for the information within that section.

Balance: The balance of the article could be improved. Topics including history, philosophy, ICF and areas of occupation have sections that are abundant in information. Topics that lack substance or length in information is health and wellness, process, and enabling occupation. Specific sections that could use editing is the section labeled "process". This section mentions that there are 11 stages in the occupational therapy process, but the section lacks in providing what the 11 stages are.

Coverage: Article is written in a non-biased voice. The article is written with facts and reliable sources to back up the facts given. There is no personal opinion or persuasive voice, but rather a clear cut and concise approach to providing factual information, history and knowledge.

Reliable source: There are numerous links to authoritative publication and significantly long list of footnotes for citations. These citations come from credible sources. Each fact within the article is appropriately cited.

Gabbylexy (talk) 01:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Gabrielle Neubauer

Hi there, it's your TA! It seems you accidentally placed your wikipedia evaluation in your personal talk page. Can you please copy and paste the evaluation into the appropriate talk space. Thank you! As701914 (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)