User talk:Gabbybrownnyc

December 2018

Hello, I'm General Ization. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Patrick Milling-Smith have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. General Ization ^Talk 16:47, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Patrick Milling-Smith. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 16:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DIVISION7 (January 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. Pls also see WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID.

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DIVISION7 (January 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NCORP; significant WP:RS coverage not found. Please also see WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID.

K.e.coffman (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI question

I'm following up on the potential WP:COI issue now raised by multiple editors (e.g. at deletion review and AfC). Do you have any undisclosed connection to DIVISION7, SMUGGLER, Patrick Milling-Smith, or Brian Carmody? Bakazaka (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bakazaka Yes, I work with the company. However I have no intention to dispel lies to glorify SMUGGLER or DIVISION7 on Wikipedia. I have only worked there for a short time and agree vehemently that the tone of the former SMUGGLER article was too promotional. It does not, however, mean the company does not exist or is not worthy of entry on Wikipedia.

Perhaps it is worthy of considering that not all WP:COI issues result in faulty information. In this specific instance, I am simply advocating that a Wikipedia article for SMUGGLER should exist, because it is similar to other such Wikipedia entries and production companies. (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RadicalMedia) Gabbybrownnyc (talk) 18:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia allows such editing as long as it follows the disclosure guidelines, and the WP:COI guidelines are meant to prompt disclosure, not to prevent editing. Personally, I hope you keep editing Wikipedia. That said, given the specific connection you've described, please take a look at WP:PAY, which describes the relevant guidelines, and WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY, which contains the instructions for disclosing your connections when there is a close financial relationship (such as employer/employee). Then follow the disclosure instructions for any article you have edited on a subject to which you have such a connection (the easy way is to put a completed {{Connected contributor (paid)}} template at the top of each article's talk page.) It's extra work, but it's important to the project. Bakazaka (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this is good information and noted. Gabbybrownnyc (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DIVISION7 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:DIVISION7, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DIVISION7

Hello, Gabbybrownnyc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DIVISION7".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]