User talk:Gabby the kitty

Welcome!

Hello, Gabby the kitty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 13:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to my article?

Why did you remove my article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabby the kitty (talk • contribs)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --John Nagle (talk) 18:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

name all the reasons you removed it and why you thought it was a hoax?

--Gabby the kitty (talk) 20:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V, WP:HOAX, not in IMDB, but in this Maxim article on phony movies.[1]. --John Nagle (talk) 20:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 40 Days and 40 Nights at McCool's

A tag has been placed on 40 Days and 40 Nights at McCool's, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 19:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wiki Love.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Wiki Love.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes

Why did you rmove my quotes? how do you know there not sliders quotes?

--Gabby the kitty (talk) 14:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the quotes from the pages about Sliders characters because I have seen each episode of Sliders, and have each episode on tape, and do not recall anything like those quotes. Perhaps those quotes are of another show? In addition, I am concerned about this edit you made to an article about a living person, in which you stated that the subject dispised another living person, and thought that another living person is the worst human who ever lived. Wikipedia has policies regarding Biographies of living persons, that state that editors must take particular care adding information about living persons and that such material requires a high level of sensitivity. I'm afraid that saying someone "dispises" another, or thinks someone is the "worst human who ever lived" is a rather strong and possibly damaging thing to say. I understand that you are new, and perhaps you were unaware of Wikipedia's policies. In the future, I'd suggest making sure you have a reliable source to verify content added about living persons. Thanks for making the List of Star Trek: Voyager cast members. Q0 (talk) 06:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then who said those quotes, and what movies are they from? --Gabby the kitty (talk) 14:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The quote is from Pulp Fiction. Q0 (talk) 14:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about this quote?

Well that's great, that's just fuckin' great man. Now what the fuck are we supposed to do? We're in some real pretty shit now man... That's it man, game over man, game over! What the fuck are we gonna do now? What are we gonna do? --Gabby the kitty (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ian Beale. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ^anemone│_projectors 22:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ^anemone│_projectors 22:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

explain to me why the characters I catagorized as androids are not androids --Gabby the kitty (talk) 22:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, because they're humans. Soap operas do not have androids. ^anemone│_projectors 22:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List reasons (and proof) why every character (including the non soap opera characters) are humans and not androids —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabby the kitty (talk • contribs)

You're the one who needs to find proof as you're the one making the claims. Cite your reliable sources. ^anemone│_projectors 22:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, WP:PROVEIT. ^anemone│_projectors 22:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will stop vandalizing wikipedia and be very good. If you want to edit or look at my list of fictional androids with emotion chips feel free to do so. I hope enjoy it. --Gabby the kitty (talk) 18:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fictional androids with an emotion chip

I have nominated Category:Fictional androids with an emotion chip (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. HokieRNB (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]