User talk:GabbyTheML

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GabbyTheML (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

are you serious, removing my editing privileges? this is my talk page, im allowed to do whatever I like it with, it is not yours. I am following all the rules of wikipedia, unblock me Gabrielle (talk) 14:57, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You do not have unrestricted use of your user talk page, there are certain guidelines. It's also pretty clear from your edit history that you are here to push an agenda or point of view and not collaborate with others in a civil manner on this encyclopedia project. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GabbyTheML (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that there is guidlines for talk pages, I will follow them from now on. However, I am not here to push an agenda and am trying to collaborate as civilly as possible, I will try harder in the future as I have read the rules again and understand them. Please Unblock Me Now Gabrielle (talk) 15:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Anyone can say that they have read the rules. That's very different to demonstrating that they understand those rules. It appears from your edits that you have one purpose here and one purpose only: stalinist apology. Since you now know that these edits won't be permitted, you'll also need to indicate what you will edit instead if unblocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will review your request, but you cannot remove declined unblock requests from this page until the block is over. 331dot (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GabbyTheML (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a "stalin apologist". I do not blindly defend him. I have researched for many many hours and hold a favorable opinion of him despite his mistakes, I am not here to say that he did nothing wrong or to exclusively edit articles related to him. I edited articles related to him because its the subject I know most about and I only edit what I know to be false, not what I disagree with. I havnt read anything in the rules requiring me to hold a specific view on historical events, that would be absurd. nothing about what I edited is "not permitted". What do I have to do to get unblocked. Edit: How about we compromise and say that I will not edit the stalinism article from now on and then you unblock me.Gabrielle (talk) 15:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. If you're not going to be civil or collaborative, you're on the wrong website. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:02, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think it's going to be difficult for you to get unblocked unless you agree to not edit about Stalin or related issues. The next reviewer will decide, but that's how I see it. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you truly are committed to building an accurate encyclopedia, Reading the following works will be helpful: WP:POVPUSH, Wikipedia:Advocacy, Civil POV pushing, and Guide to appealing blocks#Agree to follow Wikipedia community customs. Otherwise, I agree with 331dot and others.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:34, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gabrielle: I agree to follow wikipedia community customs— Preceding unsigned comment added by GabbyTheML (talk • contribs) 15:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comrade says without signing her posts.

(edit conflict) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you have to wait for the previous request to be denied before making another unblock request. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to do everything you've asked of me now unblock me Gabrielle (talk) 15:45, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am not an administrator, so I personally can't. I'm just trying to help you get acquainted with this community. Can you name some things you've learned by reading the above literature? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 15:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, Gabrielle. I sincerely tried to help you.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:00, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your continued blankings and inappropriate comments, I have removed your ability to edit this page. Your request will remain open, but if it is declined, you will need to use WP:UTRS to request unblock as described above. 331dot (talk) 16:01, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored access per your agreement on UTRS. 331dot (talk) 17:20, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gabby, your talk page access was restored per the agreement to not cause further disruption. There was no agreement that you would be unblocked. Your talk page access was removed for blanking declined requests, and yet you immediately return to doing so as soon as your talk page access was restored. If it happens again your talk page access will be revoked. Again.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GabbyTheML (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You were not very clear in informing me it was only unblocking me in editing my talk page, not wikipedia, so im asking here: just fucking unblock me already, i've been blocked long enough. ill follow all the rules

Decline reason:

It's clear that you are either unwilling or incapable of interacting civilly or collaboratively with other editors. As you broke both of the commitments made to have your talk page access restored, I have revoked access again. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:16, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unclear? Verbatem from your request:

331dot: "I would be willing to restore your talk page access if you agree to not disrupt the discussion again, either through blanking or inappropriate comments."

GabbyTheML: "Deal"

How can that be unclear? Do you really think "just fucking unblock me already" demonstrates that you will edit civilly and collaboratively moving forward?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

dont speak if you're not gonna unblock me ponyo, I dont care about whatever you have to say Gabrielle (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]