User talk:GaGu13

hello. Your recent edits for Cadillac ELR have been undone since their is a dispute of the vehicles classification. please join the ongoing discussion in the ELR's Talk page regarding it's classification. But first I'd like you to take a look at this external link about the ELR's class: http://media.gm.com/content/media/us/en/cadillac/vehicles/elr/2014.tab1.html

I'm hoping to prevent this from becoming an edit war!thank you!Among Men (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi GaGu13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cadillac ELR classification

Hello again, I reverted your recent edits on Cadillac ELR. please provide citations for the cadillac elr's classification as a sports car.Among Men (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

model year vs calendar year

For your recent changes to Toyota Celica: Please note that we use calendar. Non-American readers have trouble understanding the US specific model year system. The first generation Celica was made from December 1970 to July 1977, so it is labelled as 1970–1977. Cheers.

August 2015

Stop changing writing and production credits away from how they are listed in the film and poster, as you did at X-Men: Days of Future Past, The Wolverine (film), Maleficent (film) and others. - Gothicfilm (talk) 21:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are being warned for your editing. Be cautious. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 03:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are certain aspects of the pages for movies distributed by 20th Century Fox that are missed. Dune Entertainment is Fox's former production partner, but Dune Entertainment is not shown in the page for X-Men Origins: Wolverine or X-Men: First Class. I'd like you to please leave my edits alone. Maleficent is one thing, I admit, but I still believe Dune Ent. should be included in Origins Wolverine and First Class. I have the right to edit what I think should be edited, being a member of the Wikipedia page. So treat me like a member, not like a crazy stranger. Please and thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaGu13 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not how this works. You cannot change the credit listings of films because you want to overrule how the credits were done. If you misrepresent a film's credits, you will be reverted. Doing it repeatedly is WP:edit warring. - Gothicfilm (talk) 04:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gothicfilm is stating everything. You are entitled to the same warnings and templates as any other user, so no we will not play favoritism. Now, please stop you disruptive editing before you are blocked. On top of that, I am certain you are connected to a bunch more accounts so you're committing WP:SOCK. Stop. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 09:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at X-Men Origins: Wolverine and X-Men: First Class shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - Gothicfilm (talk) 22:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. This is your last warning. Stop your disruptive editing. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 09:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Season of the Witch (2011 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Helfrich. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Terminator Genisys

Stop modifying the lead of Terminator Genisys without discussing first on the article's talk page. I reverted your edit here explaining that an active discussion was in progress. You ignored this and proceeded to modify the lead again several days later, which I reverted again in this edit. This is not helpful. If you have something to say, contribute to the discussion. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 20:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for misuse of multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Erik II. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Martian (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Erik II (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 18:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]