User talk:G H V S Simha

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, G H V S Simha. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page K. S. Chithra, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. This is in response to this message you left on Little Professor's talkpage. If you are part of the PR team, you are obliged to read the information above. Seloloving (talk) 01:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest, seriously? Writing the true content is also a offensive thing according to you? Stop assuming the things. I am not belong to her PR Team. She is a legendary singer in India and everyone in India knows about her. She herself told about her achievements in many of her interviews publicly l. Accordingly we have written her article. G H V S Simha (talk) 12:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

“We” in the sense myself and others who are adding the content to the page (In general prospective I have said). Any one can edit Wikipedia isn’t it. I have requested lock to this page many times but my requests had been rejected G H V S Simha (talk) 16:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

“We” in the sense myself and others who are adding the content to the page.

Everybody can have the right to edit, isn’t it ? G H V S Simha (talk) 16:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Robertsky. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to K. S. Chithra have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 18:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say this, I feel that you people are intentionally targeting me for no reason. I have already cleared that I am not promoting anyone. I am saying it again and again that I have included all the relevant sources. Please check it carefully G H V S Simha (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Times of India and outlook are not independent sources. Please check it properly G H V S Simha (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me repeat what you have just put here with empahsis: Times of India and outlook are not independent sources. And yet you are using them as source? – robertsky (talk) 18:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you one page Shreya Ghoshal. Please go & verify that page. It has got so much of unsourced content G H V S Simha (talk) 18:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. Not looking at other articles. We focus on this first. See WP:WHATABOUT. – robertsky (talk) 18:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, by mistakenly I have written. They are independent valid sources G H V S Simha (talk) 18:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sources aside, the texts you introduced and reverted were promotional in tone. you need not be hired by or related to the subject to promote or advertise the subject. Even just being a fan, biased text/tone can creep in unintentionally. – robertsky (talk) 18:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for treating Wikipedia as a battleground, including logged out disruption. I have also blocked your undisclosed account, Simha Gorji, in case you regain access to it and are tempted to use it to evade your block.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish G H V S Simha (talk) 18:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]