User talk:GUPTAkanthan

July 2023

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Nina Oyama. Any material likely to be challenged must either be well-sourced or removed from these articles. User-generated sources like most wikis and IMDb are unacceptable. Idell (talk) 08:14, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Idell: IMBD is obviously unacceptable when citing stuff that are highly subjective and can vary among different sources. I know why it's not a reliable source for Wikipedia however when it comes to hard facts that aren't subject to emotional opinions, I don't think it's unreliable for Nina's birthday. In fact, if you go to her Twitter page, every 18th August, her many fans wish her a happy birthday.[1][2] I was not editing in bad faith but this current article is ridiculous for claiming that she is maybe 29 or 30, or born in 1993 or 94. When there's so many sources that have no real reason to lie about this and I am certain from her twitter page with fans, that IMBD is not being inaccurate here on this particular factoid.GUPTAkanthan (talk) 11:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

– Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere. Reply at Talk:Nina Oyama § Her B'day.