User talk:GUNJAN037
I am Winged Blades of Godric. I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm always happy to help. Alternatively, type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
Finding your way around:
|
Need quick help?
|
|
Let's get a bit more detailed
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Do's and Dont's
|
|
| If you need further help: | or you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Final reminders
- Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The
or 
button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. - If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.
- Sincerely, ∯WBGconverse 14:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]
Hello, Gunjan, you appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Tashkent Files. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ∯WBGconverse 14:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Also, please avoid politicization of the dispute, as might be inferred from your snipes about intolerance. Discuss over the three threads that I created at the t/p and even if we reach an impasse, there's further dispute resolution methods.
- Hi, Actually, it's opposite whatever I am writing is being deleted by you without any reason. You are selectively targeting by adding reviews that are bad. But when I tried to add few good ones you started to deleting, I never deleted a single line from your writing. I just want to say that everyone's views should be respected but you are trying to impose yours only. Thank you.
- Sign your posts. There is no absolute right to free speech, over here. You need to abide by the concerned policies and guidelines and I have explained over the article t/p, as to how you violate them. Feel free to rebut over there:-) ∯WBGconverse 15:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Also, see the criterion for marking an edit as minor, over here. Your last edit wasn't one. And, while I am unsure, I think that we don't accept regional reviews. Need to check the archives.∯WBGconverse 15:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, Actually, it's opposite whatever I am writing is being deleted by you without any reason. You are selectively targeting by adding reviews that are bad. But when I tried to add few good ones you started to deleting, I never deleted a single line from your writing. I just want to say that everyone's views should be respected but you are trying to impose yours only. Thank you.
- Also, please avoid politicization of the dispute, as might be inferred from your snipes about intolerance. Discuss over the three threads that I created at the t/p and even if we reach an impasse, there's further dispute resolution methods.
First of all NDTV India is not a regional channel it's a national channel. It is just that it is a Hindi news channel. In your writting also you mentioned NDTV but that's an english counterpart. Also, what the issue with reviews in Hindi. Unlike Bengali, Odiya which are regional language Hindi is a national language and more people understand Hindi than English. So, your act of deleting it is unfair. I appreciate if you revert your edit and recognize that Hindi is not a regional language. If not more it is as much recognized by the Indian Constitution as English. GUNJAN037 (talk) 07:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)GUNJAN037 (talk) 15:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Two points:--(a) please sign at the end of our post and (b) follow WP:INDENT to indent your posts properly and maintain readability.
- And, I have reverted my edit. There's a valid ground of not equating Hindi with regional ones. Best, ∯WBGconverse 17:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Important Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.