User talk:GULAMGAUS

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Love Jihad. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 14:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that you are unhappy with this article, but I'm afraid that your changes to it are not in keeping with our policies. Wikipedia exists to document what reliable published sources (such as newspapers) say about notable subjects. It is not our mission to interpret them or decide if they are right and certainly not to "set the record straight" ourselves. The article on Love Jihad does not allege that is actually happening; it simply talks about the fact the allegations and what has happened as a result of them.

If you want to talk about the general phenomenon and explain why you think it is or is not an issue, you may want to post in a blog somewhere. Any edits you make to this article need to reflect our core content policies: verifiability, neutrality and forbidding original research.

Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

As far as I know, Islamic law may be interpreted differently, and so, as you have been told above, Wikipedia is not censored in any way.

Lectonar (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Your recent editing history at Love Jihad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 17:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FALSE RUMOURS AGAINST ISLAM. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, or website etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> The Book of Chzz, Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat channel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FALSE RUMOURS AGAINST ISLAM.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zach Vega (talk) 11:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission FALSE RUMOURS AGAINST ISLAM

Hello GULAMGAUS. It has now been over a year since you last edited your article submission, entitled FALSE RUMOURS AGAINST ISLAM.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FALSE RUMOURS AGAINST ISLAM}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]