User talk:GTrang/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:GTrang, for the period July–December 2015. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hello, anyway
Though I might have written "Screw you.", may I offer you the warmest welcome to this Wikipedia. Enjoy it ... (... and do what you do, don't mind a crotchety arse like me.) Jimp 16:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Separate documentation page
I don't understand the motivation for this edit. Care to explain? --Waldir talk 00:03, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Can you explain the purpose of this? Under what circumstances does it ever contain useful content? AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Time and Date (website) (August 8)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Time and Date (website) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! GeoffreyT2000,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:52, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
|
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Tomorrow
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Tomorrow, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Tomorrow and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Tomorrow during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 21:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
HolidayJet
Hello GoffreyT2000,
Why you continually reverted my message of delation in HolidayJet's page.
The delation of this page is in according with the amministrators and please stop delate the message.
Zurich00swiss (talk) 07:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Http en.wikipedia.org wiki main page listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Http en.wikipedia.org wiki main page. Since you had some involvement with the Http en.wikipedia.org wiki main page redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 00:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Https en.wikipedia.org wiki Main Page listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Https en.wikipedia.org wiki Main Page. Since you had some involvement with the Https en.wikipedia.org wiki Main Page redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 00:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Cite doi
As long as you are nominating doi for deleting, I suggest you do jstor, pmid, hdl, and isbn also. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 03:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Marking historical
May I ask about this edit? Why did you mark that page as historical? It remains up-to-date and RfB is a live process. WJBscribe (talk) 09:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Prod
Hi, I noticed you prodded Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia (Raptors MoU) because of copyright violation. If you think the whole page should be deleted for that reason, why didn't you tag it CSD G12? Adam9007 (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Just so you know, I am in the process of moving this disambig page back to This Time It's Personal (disambiguation) because now there is a primary topic (which will undoubtedly exist by the time you read this). Have a nice day. 
Erpert blah, blah, blah... 03:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Missing_stats_dates
I presume you have seen my pings at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Missing_stats_dates, but I am just making sure. Your suggestions don't make much sense as you presented them. You need to figure out which ones have underlying data. Comment over there since I am not watching here.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
RFC notification
You may be interested in the request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#Using archives of Portal:Current events for month articles. -- John of Reading (talk) 03:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Oshkosh M1070
Blimey, giz a chance... There are only so many hours in the day.Wolpat (talk) 20:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
New Page Patrol
Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm but your New Page Patrolling clearly indicates that you are not ready for this task yet. Of particular concern is your handling of Alexander NeverMind (Artist) which shows that you did not carry out sufficient research before tagging the article. Please be sure to read WP:NPP, WP:DELETION, and WP:Page Curation/Help before patrolling any more articles and if you need help or advice don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_October_6#Windows_Phone_10, did not appear to be constructive. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Template:Rfx-question listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Rfx-question. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Rfx-question redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:05, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
This template was brought to my attention after I noticed Dawnseeker2000 removing a transclusion of it, so I thought I would point out that it is unnecessary because Template:Earthquakes by year already exists. Dustin (talk) 22:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Why would you mark my article to be deleted
Hype would you mark my article yout could tell that i was still writing it !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhindori (talk • contribs) 01:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello GeoffreyT2000. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.
In addition, pages in user space, like the one you tagged in this edit, should only ever be tagged for speedy deletion if they contain copyright violations or constitute an attack page — most other speedy deletion criteria simply do not apply to pages in user space or in draft space, and pages in those spaces are not required to show notability. Thanks in advance for your future compliance. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 19:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I've realized that I misread the page history and that the article in question was in fact in mainspace when you nominated it for speedy deletion. Apologies for the confusion. The fact remains, however, that pages should not be tagged for speedy deletion under A7 after just three minutes. Feel free to join the discussion at the Teahouse if you have any further questions. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 19:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Climb Online
Hi. Not entirely sure why this has been recommended for deletion? The page is certainly relevant to the public: it is the business founded by Lord Sugar & 2014 Apprentice winner Mark Wright. This show is incredibly popular and watched by millions. Whilst the references could be expanded on perhaps, there aren't a great deal out there. Hence, to that end, this page is fully referenced & is written from an independent source point. This page is of critical interest to anyone who watches the TV show, who follows Lord Sugar & indeed Mark Wright - the guy who won.
Rather than recommending deletion - the easy option - perhaps you should work with other Wikipedia community users and expand the references to improve the article. Improving is far better than deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.240.98 (talk) 13:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
Hello, I'm 188.32.104.125. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 188.32.104.125 (talk) 04:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 188.32.104.125 (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 188.32.104.125 (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Sandbox
You may be interested in the fact that you have your own private sandbox: User:GeoffreyT2000/sandbox. Far better for testing stuff than the main one which is mostly for newbies. HighInBC 17:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Your fix at WT:MOS
Hello Geoffrey. Thanks for your fix. Did you intend to add your own signature at the bottom of the change? EdJohnston (talk) 02:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Redirect technical notes
Geoffrey, if you see an outdated passage (such as Wikipedia:Redirect# Technical notes), the correct thing to do is to update, instead of deleting it. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 19:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Windows powered, GeoffreyT2000.
Unfortunately MrX has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
This page should not have been marked as reviewed. It has several problems. Please see WP:NPP.
To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.