User talk:GLOBALCREATOR

Zephyrnthesky your help would be much appreciated as sections and quotes were just deleted. I am new to wikipedia I'm just doing a favor. If you need any information, quotes, history whatever I can hook you up with that if you like. Thanks for all of your help :) The page is very confusing now.

I have to admit to being confused as well. The extent of my connection to Will to Power prior to finding this article about a year ago was that I traded somebody a Bananarama cassette for a Will to Power one back when people still listened to cassettes. The info on this article should be neutral point of view, which it hasn't been for a while, in my opinion. I've honestly tried improving the whole article and keeping the bias out, no matter what. I didn't think that message board comments about someone met the criteria for a reliable source, which wikipedia strives for. Maybe someone else needs to take the lead on this and advise everyone the best way to proceed. Seriously, though, I intended to make this better, and my actions have clearly upset you, so for that I'm sorry. But that doesn't mean it should go back to the way it was before, either. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 04:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank You for keeping your interest in Will to Power honest as I am. It is greatly appreciated as slanderous things have been put on the internet previously. As far as the artist himself having a say in the page, well he can have it taken down if he so chooses. The page if meant for fans. I hope everyone enjoys the music and history of Will to Power/ Bob Rosenberg and various artists.

The page is not meant for fans, it is meant for everyone, and the artist can not take it down if he so chooses. The artist does not own this page, nor does any wikipedia user.Drew Smith What I've done 05:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Will to Power (band). Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 01:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Hi, sorry didn't mean to offend anyone here but I am Bob Rosenbergs lawyer and working directly with him and referencing Billboard Magazine, Yahoo Music, Bill Tanner, Jeff Lemlich and Chuck Eddy for the information to be provided as accurately and fairly to everyone involved. It is a waste of time to have to keep changing this page on a daily basis. If this continues only a minimal amount of information will remain up as per Will To Power/Bob Rosenberg. If you have something to add try sending a message before altering this page. Otherwise I will keep a vigilante watch over it.

In this case, I'd like to refer you to our conflict of interest guidelines (WP:COI), and also to remind you that neither you nor your client own or have any substantial creative control over the contents of any article on Wikipedia, even those which specifically concern your client (WP:OWN). I don't know if you intended to imply it above, but I believe what you say above is suggestive of an intent to engage in an edit war to maintain preferred content; edit warring on Wikipedia shall not be tolerated (WP:EW). If you have any questions at all, they would be welcomed at the noticeboard for requests for editor assistance (WP:EAR), though I will strongly admonish you to make a strong attempt to assume that other editors are acting in good faith (WP:AGF), and not make unsubstantiated accusations of editorial malfeasance, as it appears you've made before (see here). Thanks! —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 01:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Will to Power, May 2009

Hello, I've started a discussion thread on the talk page for Will to Power. Since you have contributed to the article, I would welcome any input you could provide as to ways we could work together to improve the article. Thanks. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 03:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you have undone a substantial revision to the Will to Power article that I made earlier today. I am trying to improve the quality of the article, and I began a discussion thread on the talk page (as noted above). The section I added attempts to make the article more in line with those for other musical groups by neutrally describing noteworthy events and songs in a chronological order, broken down into sections and including references. Is there something specific about the edits I've made that seems wrong to you? I welcome your participation in the talk page discussion. Thanks. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 02:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello, GLOBALCREATOR. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 05:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Will to Power (band)

Ok, I want to make this clear. Personal attacks like this are not allowed. Do not do that again. We have a very strict policy on how we describe living people and that applies to talk pages too. You can and will make your point without attacking either individuals in real life or here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Just to be clear: just because you are making an attack in an edit summary doesn't get you off the hook. I mean it, knock that off right now. No more comments about who is or isn't "authorized" in your mind to edit here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll second that. You are treading on very thin ice at this point. You must follow the civility policy and, considering the above linked edit summaries, stop assuming that this is your article. —Travis^talk 02:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

ANI Discussion

Hello, GLOBALCREATOR. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -download ׀ sign! 02:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

Further to this (extended) thread at the Administrators' notice board, I have blocked your account from editing for one week to prevent further disruption on the Will to Power (band) article. Your issues with the article content are no excuse for displaying article ownership or edit-warring; this series of edits, where despite having received editing advice from a number of experienced editors you again removed content you dislike (introducing errors in the process), was the final straw. You may appeal this block by copy/pasting below this message the template {{unblock|your reason here}}, replacing 'your reason here' with your text. You may find it useful to read our guide to block appeals first. EyeSerene^talk 10:19, 13 May 2009 (UTC)