User talk:GK DHAS

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~ GB fan 08:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GK DHAS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have a to update new Content GK DHAS (talk) 12:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GK DHAS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Dhas G.K (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

new user name

Decline reason:

Regardless of the name you use, you will not be allowed to write about yourself or any subject with which you have a conflict of interest on Wikipedia. With that in mind, what edits would you make if unblocked? Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GK DHAS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Dhas G K (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Dhas is my name and G.K is my father name Gnanamani kanagappu that is Dhas G K

Decline reason:

In the reason given for the block, "your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group" was evidently a mistake, as it is evidently a personal name. However, the other part of the block reason, namely that your account has been used only for promotion, is perfectly valid. Your account is not likely to be unblocked unless you make it clear that you understand that and will not make promotional edits again, and give some indication what kind of editign you will do instead. JBW (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are unwilling or unable to answer the questions posed, let us know and I will revoke your access to this talk page to avoid you wasting any more of our time. --Yamla (talk) 12:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GK DHAS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fairly understood your queries.The Contents to be given will be factual and not promotional any more

Decline reason:

You haven't given us any idea of what you will edit, or what kinds of words you will use to describe those topics. For example, many newish editors with a conflict of interest seem to have trouble telling whether they're being promotional in their wording. If you make an unblock request via WP:UTRS, please address these issues. If you need help, please see Haley Morris-Cafiero, a biographical article that I wrote a while ago. It's about a controversial photographer who publishes images of people mocking her appearance. Our encyclopedia article summarizes what independent sources say about her work without editorializing about it ourselves. Jason Zinoman is an article I wrote about a critic and author. I haven't read much of his work, and I don't know how good he is. I saw him in a documentary, and he seemed to make some good points. I think I also cited a few passages of his non-fiction book Shock Value, which I also created an article for. You can see that I tried my best to research the topic and fairly show what critics thought of that book. I didn't include my own thoughts, and, honestly, I haven't read enough of it to know whether it's any good. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:33, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.