User talk:GFHS

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GFHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

GFHS is just an international NGO organization, and is committed to sustainable cities and human settlements for all.GFHS (talk) 07:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked until:

you propose a new username that meets the username policy
you confirm that this account is used by one individual only
you agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organisation (requested edits will still be permitted)
you agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose your paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
you indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GFHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Sabrina.He (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Totally understand the reason for my block and that I will not repeat the kind of edits for which I have been blocked.

Decline reason:

That would be an acceptable new username choice. However, to be unblocked, please address the points made by Yunshui above; this will help to demonstrate your understanding of the reason for your block and assure the next administrator to review this that the problematic edits will not repeat. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Past declined unblock requests must remain here until the block is removed. 331dot (talk) 10:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GFHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Sabrina.He (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Here to confirm that first, this account is used by myself only; second, the articles I will share will not cause any of COI; third, I agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy; fourth, I wish to share something related to sustainable and green urban development

Decline reason:

This unblock request is contradictory. On the one hand, you say you will not violate COI. On the other hand, you state that you plan to only write about subject areas for which you have a conflict of interest. No, you will not be unblocked to do that. If this is your only goal here, this is the end of the line. Yamla (talk) 11:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Global Forum on Human Settlements for their contributions to Wikipedia.

Seems that I am also confused by your comments. I have been asked to indicate what areas I want to share in the future, currently, the COVID-19 is quite serious all over the world, the sustainable and resilient urban development is quite necessary, I don't quite understand why I have a conflict of interest if I want to share more in this aspect, please help specify, very appreciated!