User talk:GBen3535

Hello this is BtotheotherB Btotheotherb (talk) 01:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello to you. Wiki editing is fuunnnnn!! 2601:18C:4200:CFF0:3C19:326B:1AA1:4BB7 (talk) 01:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello Friend! -Emma :) Emma Ambrogi (talk) 01:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, GcBenedetto, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Predatory source

Hi User:GBen3535, I noticed that "Synthesis, Properties, and Their Potential Application of Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs)" by Deng, Lifeng et. al. is from a predatory publication. It was automatically edit-tagged (see filters) as a predatory publication (and therefore unreliable source). IntechOpen shows up on Beall's list of predatory publishers, and likely does not conduct peer review, which makes the material unreliable due to effectively being self-published, like a blog. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Questionable2 (aka WP:CITEWATCH) and the Reliable sources/Perennial sources noticeboard history

If you want to stay ahead of these problems, consider installing the Unreliable/Predatory Source Detector (UPSD) (a user script), which automatically highlights suspicious citations.

It's probably best to remove the citation and the material that came from it, unless you can find a reliable reference to back it up. If you're sure it's true but cannot source it at the moment, a {{citation needed}} tag might be appropriate, though as an expert on the subject you're probably the most qualified person to find the right sources.

Good luck, and sorry for the extra work. --Anon423 (talk) 17:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)