User talk:G87

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fix it again Tony, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TN X Man 20:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish Fix it again Tony to be deleted then please take it to WP:RFD. Pointless speedy notices constitute disruptive editing. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fix it again...

Hello, I think you should inform the WP:CARS group of this voting (there is discussion board) --Typ932 ^T·C 09:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

I initiated a thread on ANI on the Fix it again Tony situation. Killiondude (talk) 21:00, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a response in my defence. By doing this, your obviously trying to get me blocked in an attempt to KEEP this Joke-redirect. Like you, I have an opinion on the topic and have stated facts in an appropriate mannor. You have to take it this far? G87 21:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for edit warring on Fiat Automobiles. You have shown no interest in discussion; but you are happy to revert without substantial reason. This is disruptive behaviour. Please cease to war after your block, and be more willing to discuss rather than revert. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Unbelievable. You have bocked me with no valid reason. So I get blocked for rewording a statement to appear more relevant/appropriate?? How about blocking the other party who I'm supposed to be edit-warring with?? How have I breached 3RR? And actually I'm fully engaged in discussions on the issue here [1] which I can no longer participate. You really shouldnt have admin rights! G87 21:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

G87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel that I have been unfairly blocked by PeterSymonds with no valid reason. I have been accused of edit-warring, so how about this other party? Also, I'm now unable to participate in my current discussions here [2] - something which I've been advised to do in the block notice above! Please could an Admin review this and remove this block.

Decline reason:

Endorse the block as cut-and-dried edit-warring (3 reverts is not an entitlement). Also, your accusatory tone below only damages your case, chummer. PS: You were reverted by three different editors who were enforcing the consensus. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 01:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I won't formally decline this unblock request, but it looks like a very solid block to me. You need to take a step back from this Fiat issue, and a block seems like the only real way to get you to do so at the moment. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm not going to let this issue to rest if thats what is intended. I would expect this comment from you as you voted KEEP in discussion here [3]. Being blocked without valid reason is only going to make me more determined to get this issue resolved. So, no, i'm not going to step back from this until i'm statified with the outcome. G87 22:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FiaT and FORD redirects

Hello, G87. You have new messages at Amorymeltzer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have responded to your comment on my talk page. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Fiat Marylebone.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fiat Marylebone.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 20:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fiat Group logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fiat Group logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:37, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fiat Automobiles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bridgeplayer (talk) 23:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fiat Professional Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fiat Professional Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fiat Professional Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fiat Professional Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]