User talk:G.Bracchi

Welcome!

Hello, Giobrach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

I don't understand your edit, "nba" and "bc" to the documentation {{Infobox Bach composition}}. The documentation reflects the template, and there are no such parameters in it. If you think they should be, then place to request woujld be the talk page of that template. I don't think it will be successful, though, because many find it too long as it is, and others want to merge it with {{Infobox musical composition}} where specific Bach parameters would have no room. - I am reverting for now, because without matches in the template and the description, it's only confusing, sorry. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm sorry for my clumsiness in editing, it is my first time with infoboxes. It was not my intention to mess with the documentation page, just the template sandbox. I was trying to add more info on common Bach catalogs (the NBA edition volume and the Bach Compendium) that, until now, would only be available on external websites such as www.bach-cantatas.com. It is very Bach-specific but non-trivial information. --Giobrach (talk) 11:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding. Please, as said above, make such a request at the template talk, or at Project Classical Music, which may be your friend. Do you think it should be in the articles? For me almost a prerequsite for being in the infobox. Perhaps edit one of them as you think it should be, how about BWV 125? I'll watch. With sources, of course ;) - Nice to meet you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice meeting you too! I will make the request as you say. What do you mean with "Do I think it should be in the articles?"? Do you mean in the body of the article, or specifically in the infobox that is embedded within the article? Then yes and yes. Also, if it's the latter option, do you mean I can edit the infobox in a single page without affecting the other instances of the same infobox? If so, how do I do it practically? (Tried with BWV 19 before and failed miserably.) Sorry again for being so clumsy. --Giobrach (talk) 12:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bach Compendium (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide more news sources that show that this compilation is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bach Compendium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bach Compendium, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Giobrach! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bach Compendium

Hello, Giobrach. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bach Compendium".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 14:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]