User talk:Fylindfotberserk/Archives/2021/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Fylindfotberserk. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Removing Infobox YouTube personality from the articles of pro wrestlers
Hi. Please read this. Cheers! Wario-Man talk 04:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamed tosuppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
Arbitration
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
Punjabier?
Could you take a look at [1]? --RegentsPark (comment) 00:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Just noticed you haven't edited in a while. Hope all is well. Best wishes. --RegentsPark (comment) 17:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Belated Birthday wishes
Hey Fylindfotberserk, belated wishes on your birthday. Thank you for all your contributions here on Wikipedia and you have a wonderful year ahead.
— LeoFrank Talk 11:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Where are you?
Yes, I too noticed that your last edit was on April 21. This is an uncharacteristically long hiatus. Hope all is well. Chaipau (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Average human height by country
Hi Fylindotberserk. After this discussion, I went ahead and removed the convoluted spreadsheet that we both know is traced to WP:MIRROR regarding its own findings. No point me repeating what I said at the talk. The way I see it is that although there were just the two of us to have the discussion, the thread was opened two months ago and nobody else came along to defend the source, or argue that it is not MIRROR. That said, one concealed IP has twice restored the information (not against me, but a new editor whom I later welcomed but am not affiliated to), but another restored it again. Only now have I logged in to remove it again. If you see any unpleasant activity, I would more than welcome your talk page interventions. Kind regards. --Coldtrack (talk) 18:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)