User talk:Fuzzyandtoast

All That

Hey Fuzzyandtoast! I am really glad you are a fan of All That. I am too and we all wish that it continued for 10 more seasons. But you can't add that there is going to be more seasons to the article without source. It is considered vandalism by many. BOVINEBOY2008 19:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to All That (Season eleven). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 23:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of All That (Season eleven)

The article All That (Season eleven) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 00:05, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Template:All That. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 01:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Amanda Show.

Any idea why Episode 29 (Season two, EP 17) hasn't re-aired since its original airing? However, EP 38 has re-aired since its original airing. - Zhang He (talk) 01:16, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to The Amanda Show (not a warning, a question).

I reverted your edit saying The Amanda Show will stop airing on The N on July 31st. Are you sure about that? Because I emailed The N a couple weeks ago asking why they were skipping four episodes each week (Ex: Last episode was EP 5 on a Friday, but they started with EP 10 Monday). They responded and said that the episodes would be shown in order when they restart from the beginning sometime in August. - Zhang He (talk) 16:02, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fuzzyandtoast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! bodnotbod (talk) 15:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Fox Kids. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Powergate92Talk 00:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nick GAS

The channel has ended. It's not coming to TeenNick. It's not going to be relaunched. It's over. Stop adding erronous and unsourced information. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 06:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No they won't. You don't have the proof that they will, and I don't forsee it being readded. They have moved on and unless you can find a reliable source and future schedule, don't add it. Nate • (chatter) 00:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Th agu logo.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Th agu logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fuzzy and Toast

A tag has been placed on Fuzzy and Toast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. AnturiaethwrTalk 21:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Fuzzy and Toast episodes

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on List of Fuzzy and Toast episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Singularity42 (talk) 22:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. You have violated one or more of our rules, including rules against adding spam links, posting advertisements, using Wikipedia for promotion, and editing inappropriately with a conflict of interest. Although Wikipedia has a great many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals here, you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

If you do intend to make contributions that are in line with Wikipedia's policies, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} below this message box.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

See also Wikipedia:Appealing a block for more information.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fuzzyandtoast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

EvanFinney09 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Because I will not add anything that is not true any more for the rest of my life!

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abusive alternate account of User:ELF TV. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of My Family's Got Guts episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of My Family's Got Guts episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of My Family's Got Guts episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]