User talk:Fuzzk1

Hi, Fuzzk1. You appear to be a new wikipedia editor. Welcome aboard, and I hope you find the experience rewarding. There are, however, some rules regarding appropriate conduct. I am referring to your contributions at the macrophilia page.

There needs to be a consensus among the interested editors to add material to a page. When two or more editors disagree on whether some passage is appropriate, the text is discussed here on the page's talk page. Two editors have disagreed with your additions to macrophilia, and have asked you to discuss it before re-adding it. Please do.
— James Cantor (talk) 22:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR at macrophilia

There is another rule on wikipedia, called the "three revert rule" or WP:3RR. The rule is that editors may not perform the same edit on the same page more than three times in a 24 hour period. Doing consitutes was is called "edit warring," and engaging in edit warring on WP is taken very seriously can can result in being blocked from editing.

You have added the same material to the macrophilia page three times now. Please discuss the issue on the talk page before repeating.
— James Cantor (talk) 22:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Green Giants and other things

Hi,

If you'd be interested, I think we could put your list of giants and small people in a separate movie/TV article if you can think of a good title for it. Within, it might be appropriate to list microphilia and macrophilia as references. The trick is to maintain a balance with the public interests.

Interested? Let me know what title you'd like and I'll set it up for you or I'll help you set it up.

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 19:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. If you choose to eMail me, be sure to leave me a message on my talk page reminding me to check my eMail!

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 23:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Attack of the 50 Foot Woman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Continued violation of 3RR at 50 Foot Woman

Despite being warned about a similar tactic on the macrophilia page, you are in danger of violating WP's "three revert rule" or WP:3RR. The rule is that editors may not perform the same edit on the same page more than three times in a 24 hour period. Continuing to repeatedly post is (as explained by User:James Cantor) "edit warring." This is a serious offense, and may result in you being blocked from editing.

You have added the same material to the 50 Foot Woman page three times now in the span of two days. Please discuss the issue on the talk page before repeating.Haywire3000 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Garfield Gets Real, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grimm and Blondie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Garfield and Friends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heathcliff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Real Ghostbusters, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]