User talk:Futureshockcomicsmcgreal

March 2013

Hello Futureshockcomicsmcgreal. How's it going. I just reviewed your submission to AfC, and I have a few comments about the proposed article. You've got three articles here, really, one about the strip, and two bios. The bios are also largely unreferenced, which is a problem (see our biographies of living persons policy). I think the topic is notable, running in a big paper, etc., but the article should only cover the artists as they relate to the strip, if I'm making sense? If you can trim this down to an article just about the strip, we can move it to the live article space. Also, it seems you might have a close connection to the topic, no? Might be good to take a look at our conflict of interest guideline if so. Best regards, and feel free to post questions here, or at my talk page. regards, The Interior (Talk) 07:26, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the trophy, Pat. (I'm a Pat also) I've moved the article into mainspace: Future Shock Comics. A few more jobs to get the article up to spec though. Right now the references are just URLs - please format them for me. This can be used by clicking the "cite" button in the edit window header, or by incorporating the the templates located here: WP:CITET. Second, and more importantly, some of the articles you had under "External links" should be incorporated as references. (I've moved them over to the "Talk" page of the article) They are preferred to refs to your own website, and need to be in place to demonstrate notability. Otherwise the article could be nominated for deletion. I'm here to help if you need it, The Interior (Talk) 22:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And pie, wow. As for expansion, that's related to what's been written by third parties about the strip. For newer topics that are lower visibility (no offense), this can be a limiting factor. As new press, or reviews, or retrospectives, or academic papers get written, there's new material to mine for content. But expansions really have to be based on what reliable sources have written on the topic. Did you say your friend started a new version somewhere? I can't seem to find it ... The Interior (Talk) 23:38, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pat, sorry so long in replying, I was on a bit of a break. I see you've done some cleanup. To be a perfectionist, you could look at Wikipedia:Citing sources and get your refs up to top-notch level - right now you've got a list of just article titles that aren't cited inline - if one of the url's changes at the source, it will be hard for an editor to verify without more bibliographic info: publisher, date, author, etc. Re your message on PDF's, they're fine if the url is formatted properly (or acceptable anyways, but as above with the linkrot problem). Now, you must use your hard-won wiki-formatting skills to improve other articles, hint hint, nudge nudge. The Interior (Talk) 15:45, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Future Shock Comics.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! gwickwire^talk_editing 00:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Welcome!

Hello, Futureshockcomicsmcgreal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]