User talk:Futuredim

David Kinigson moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to David Kinigson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs sources from reliable, secondary sources to established notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Kinigson (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sirdog was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A majority of the sources provided are written by or include information provided by the subject, which Wikipedia (generally) does not permit be used to establish that a person or topic is notable enough to warrant it's own article. Unfortunately, being an award-winning hairdresser within of itself is insufficient to meet the notability criteria. You need to provide multiple independent and reliable sources that give significant coverage to David Kinigson. I would also advise reading our neutral point of view policy, as with the content currently provided it appears that it would be incredibly easy to enter "reading like a resume" territory, which is not something Wikipedia wants or encourages.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Kinigson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Sirdog (talk) 07:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Futuredim! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Sirdog (talk) 07:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Macdonald5122 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TrushingK23. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 15:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Kinigson

Hello, Futuredim. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Kinigson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Kinigson

Hello, Futuredim. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David Kinigson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]