User talk:FutureAirways

Speedy deletion of Victoria Manor

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Victoria Manor

A tag has been placed on Victoria Manor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. brew crewer (yada, yada) 00:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Victoria Manor

A tag has been placed on Victoria Manor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 02:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Victoria Manor, you will be blocked from editing. This page has been created and deleted four times now. Please stop. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 02:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Manor

Howdy and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed you have created a page on the band Victoria Manor. While Wikipedia appreciates new content, the articles have to be about something or someone which has achieved a fairly substantial amount of fame. The specific guideline on bands can be found at WP:BAND. The article you created does not seem to show any media coverage or critical reviews, or other evidence of notability. That is, I think, the reason it has been deleted several times. If you have any questions, feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker. Thanks again for the interest in the project. --TeaDrinker (talk) 02:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, although I am not sure I understand. Please check over WP:BAND. If you think that Victoria Manor meets the criteria there, let me know. With regard to admins having secret pages, you might be referring to userpages, which are in the User namespace (the title starts with "User:"). In fact all registered users (admin or not) may have a user page (mine, for instance, is User:TeaDrinker; yours is User:FutureAirways). They are for describing yourself and you editing interests in Wikipedia (see WP:USER for more details). Thanks and let me know if you have any questions. --TeaDrinker (talk) 02:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Victoria Manor, you will be blocked from editing. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 03:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not attempt to add material to a discussion topic after the debate has closed. To do so is to falsify the archive. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]