Jump to content

User talk:Futanari expert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Futanari expert, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Futanari have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  Tutelary (talk) 01:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Futanari  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 01:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Futanari with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 01:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ... discospinster talk 02:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Futanari expert (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, I honestly have NO idea what I did wrong. I fixed some errors to the Futanari page, but Discospinster reverted me and said I was vandalizing. He did not assume good faith. So I took him to ANI. But he CENSORED MY COMPLAINT and blocked me! What the heck! Is this allowed? He CENSORED HIMSELF on ANI, replaces good information with hoaxes and he BLOCKED me! Also I request that the request be replied by an admin OTHER than Discospinster, as he is obviously have grudge against me. Futanari expert (talk) 02:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edits to Futanari replaced valid, sourced information with a rip-off of text from the Five Points Gang article. So, there's two things you did wrong: 1) deleting a sourced article and 2) adding deliberate misinformation. Together, that constitutes vandalism. —C.Fred (talk) 02:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.