User talk:Fusionn1

Welcome

Hip hop music

I love hip hop. My favorite artist currently is Kendrick Lamar. Fusionn1 (talk) 04:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Fusionn1

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only edit pages to fix them so that they contain the correct information, not to vandalize them. I almost always provide an explanation when I edit something on a page if needed. I also provide a source and an explanation when I edit something when needed. I will promise to edit less and be more careful when I edit so that people won't think I'm abusing the editing. I only tried to help make the Wikipedia pages better so that they contain the right and neccessary information they need. I hope you understand.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23830 was submitted on Jan 25, 2019 15:53:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't realize I was disrupting a page and committing sock puppetry. I promise to not do the same mistakes again and I will only edit so that the wiki pages contain the correct information with sources.I will also edit less if needed.Fusionn1 (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - duplicate appeal Just Chilling (talk) 22:40, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the disruption I did and I promise I will not violate any rules again. I will only edit if neccessary and provide valid explanations to my edits and cite sources.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 11:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23834 was submitted on Jan 26, 2019 00:44:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because I promise I will not cause disruptive editing and "sock puppetry" which is what the admin ad orientem supposedly said I did. I also promise to provide valid explanations to every edit I make and cite sources when needed.

Decline reason:

You need to return to User:KillerGho$t and request to be unblocked from that account, in doing so listing any and all accounts you have used. Only one open unblock request is needed; subsequent statements should be standard comments without the unblock formatting. 331dot (talk) 11:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because I got blocked for no reason because someone thought I was User:KillerGho$t even though I am not and they have no evidence. This is my only account I've ever used on Wikipedia and Ad Orientem was the one who blocked me so I would like to speak to a better administrator to sort this out because this is an error and false communication.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - duplicate appeal. Unless you stop making more than one at a time you will lose talk page access. Finally, denials of the connection User:KillerGho$t are hopeless. You need to explain the connection. Just Chilling (talk) 19:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I was disrupting a page and committing sock puppetry" "This is my only account I've ever used on Wikipedia". Which of those two contradictory statements is true? Why did you make the other, false, statement? Why should we believe you now? --Yamla (talk) 17:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The statement that is true is the one where I said this is my only account. There is no evidence that you can prove that I'm KillerGho$t or associate with that user.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because I was falsely accused by an admin named Ad Orientem who claimed that I was another user named User:KillerGho$t even though I'm not. At first I said I was disrupting a page because I thought repeatedly editing a page to have information is disrupting so I believed it but I was confused about the sock puppetry part. But then a user named 331dot (talk) said I got blocked because they thought I was another person named User:KillerGho$t even though I'm not and there is no evidence to that false accusation. I am not associated with that user. I got falsely claimed. There is legit no evidence to that. Someone told me to sign in to KillerGho$t 3ven though that's not my account. I literally got blocked for no reason, just because I edited a lot that they thought I was someone else.

Decline reason:

There is no way that you are not related to the other account. Your edits are far too similar. You need to explain your connection. 5 albert square (talk) 22:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't even know who KillerGho$t is. I had nothing to do with what that person did. I didn't commit anything bad. I was accused of something I didn't do. If Wiki Admins were professional, they would know that I'm not an alt and that this is the only account I have on Wiki.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - duplicate request. Just Chilling warned you above that you would lose TPA if you continually did this so I'm now revoking TPA. You may appeal using the Unblock Ticket Request System - however you have a limited number of appeals through this. You have already used 3 - you would need to make your next appeal count and address your connection with the other user in order for your appeal to stand any chance. 5 albert square (talk) 22:13, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Fusionn1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24869 was submitted on Apr 24, 2019 01:28:46. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]