User talk:Furyalus

December 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 15:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Furyalus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

which edit caused this block?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:55, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Furyalus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This was blocked suddenly without warning. Which of my edits indicate I'm "WP:NOTHERE"??. Furyalus (talk) 15:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

How about ALL your edits in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bradbury (talk • contribs)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Furyalus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Question: How about ALL your edits in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bradbury (talk • contribs)
Answer: SPI pages are like any article on WP. Anyone can edit those pages. If you don't agree with the edits, it's better to talk about it than fight. Furyalus (talk) 16:18, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not so; although no-one is fighting. Getting yourself in areas in which you have no competence, and where competence is needed, is not appropriate and WP:NOTHERE is a fair assessment. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Editing in Wikipedia

Unless you have an undisclosed account or have edited as an anonymous editor, this is your first day here. Working in the sockpuppet field requires significant experience here, and in many cases will require checkuser ability as well. You have neither of these at present. To attempt to decide as to whether sockpuppetry has, or has not occurred, on the basis of similarity, or lack thereof, in usernames can only be seen as naiive. Please do not do it again. It is usual to suggest that new editors spend some months initially making small, but increasing in significance and size, edits until they are confident that they know what they are doing. It would appear that presently you do not. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention you're impersonating a CheckUser, and that anyone who knows anything about Ryulong is definitely not new. Katie^talk 16:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KrakatoaKatie:, it's clear that:

You have nothing better to do than target sock accounts and are good at playing the SPI game. The more you edit the SPI pages, the more fun it becomes to play. You blocked me because you weren't happy a new user was contributing to the SPI pages.
There is no point in posting another {{unblock}} request as it's clear nobody is willing to unblock. So don't be surprised if I create another username since I tried to get this name unblock without any success. Furyalus (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The block does not refer just to this account; it applies to you, the editor, personally, whatever guise you edit under. Block evasion, when detected, is immediately countered by the imposition of a further block. It is, of course, also true that if you were to create another account and then again show your inexperience by posting edits beyond your level of competence in admin-related areas then detection would not be difficult. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:07, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Bradbury: well, given the fact you refused {{unblock}} three times, what do you expect me to do if I want to edit?? There really is no such thing as "block evasion" since the site invited the whole world to edit. Even so, it's done only as a last resort when all other means fail. Furyalus (talk) 02:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Krakatoa Katie:@Yamla:::For the record, only twice by me. And the second was in response to your inappropriate use of a further unblock template to pose o question on my first unblock decline. I would seriously suggest that you recognize that block evasion is real, and that you avoid doing it if you truly want to be a long-term and valued editor here. You ask what I expect you to do; I have no comment to make on that question as phrased, but I can tell you what we would like you to do.

1. Indicate that you understand the reason for your block.

2. Undertake to avoid the repeat of the behavior which led to your block.

3. Agree to edit productively and within your level of competence, which will obviously improve with experience. As a factor in this condition you should avoid areas which are unarguably admin-related until your competence increases to the point where you can make relevant input in them.

As I have already, as you more or less pointed out, made two determinations on your block it would be incorrect for me to make another one. But if you were to make a further request based on my comment I feel that another admin would look on it with some sympathy.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]