User talk:Furawi

August 2020

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 2402:1980:2C3:14B7:76C5:1AC9:D10:7D9C (talk) 10:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User Talk

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, Furawi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 00:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Oh, thanks. Peaceray for your service and attention for my. Me always I firm when I edit a user talk. Im spanish. Thanks for create this pagine! Furawi 26 September 2017 (UTC).

Joy Ang

Just to follow up here. The Adventure Time article is a featured article, meaning it has been vetted and peer-reviewed and deemed one of the best WP has to offer. If you want to add info to the article, that's totally OK (and highly encouraged!) but you're going to need to add a high-quality source to back up any additions you make. I know who Joy Ang is, but your edit was both unsourced and ungrammatical.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:19, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gorillaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rockit (Gorillaz song)

The article Rockit (Gorillaz song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSONG. A Google search returns only one article which mentions it in passing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Phil roc (c) 18:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Weymouth as Noodle

Where's your source for Tina Weymouth being the current voice of Noodle? The only source I can find for her ever contributing to the group was providing the "la-la" backing vocals to "19-2000", she's never been credited as Noodle (and in that song Noodle's vocals were Miho Hatori, and the most recent case of Noodle talking, for the 2016 Jaguar commercial, was provided by Haruka Kuroda per this tweet. --Muppet321 (talk) 03:16, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gorillaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Furawi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minecraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hypixel sourcing

Please stop adding unsourced or primary sourced content to the Hypixel article. Wikipedia relies on reliable secondary sources. You can find such at WP:VG/RS for video games specifically. You have been reverting other people's edits, removing problem-marking tags, and adding the same unsourced information repeatedly, all without leaving any edit summaries. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:00, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Megamind: Music from the Motion Picture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"NameMC" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NameMC. Since you had some involvement with the NameMC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Not a very active user (talk) 14:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! -- Mikeblas (talk) 02:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikeblas Ok I will do that. Thank you. Furawi (talk) 02:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop scrubbing the words "LDS Church" and "Mormon" from articles

I realize that LDS Church guidelines since 2018 have requested that people stop using those words, but on Wikipedia we aren't constrained to follow the church's preferences, and our manual of style explicitly allows us to use those terms. Regarding the word "Mormon", first, we follow the lead of reliable secondary sources, many of whom still use the word when referring to the church and its memebers. Second, calling people "Latter-day Saints" out of the blue with no explanation is confusing to readers in our very broad audience, many of whom are completely unfamiliar with Mormonism and its WP:Jargon. Most people associate "Saints" with Catholicism, and when you start talking about "Saints" to Catholics (oh, sorry, I mean, members of the Holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church) they're liable to think you're talking about dead people who have been recently canonized. ~Awilley (talk) 04:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to: "you mean my editions of the LDS edition of the Bible and Template:Latter-day Saints right?"

No. I'm talking about edits like these:

[1] where you changed at least 13 instances of "LDS Church" to "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (making the "see also" templates at the tops of sections unmanageable, while simply removing links to articles with the word "Mormon" in the title like Black people and Mormonism
[2] where you changed 5 instances of "LDS Church" to "church", effectively scrubbing the article of all instances of the term "LDS Church" with the edit summary "removing redundant words"
[3] 6 more instances of "LDS Church" changed to "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" (wait, I thought we were concerned about redundant words)
[4] 1 instance of each (shortening and lengthening)
[5] Removed the only image from an article, presumably because it contained the term "LDS" with the excuse of it being an old logo, but you neglected to replace it with the new logo.
[6] Another "LDS Church" -> "church"
[7] and [8] More "LDS Church" -> "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
[9] "Less active Mormon" -> "Less active Latter-day Saint". "Ex-Mormon" -> "Ex-Latter-day Saint"
[10] Removed Mormonism from the infobox in the main Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints article.

Forgive me if I see a pattern. For whatever reasons, the terms "LDS Church" and "Mormon" seem to disappear from articles you edit. ~Awilley (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Awilley 1: those are wikilinks and were already discussed in the talk page by other administrator, and he decided to leave it like that.

2: yes, it is redundant because the article is about the Church not about other church or a person, so it's redundant to always say "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" or "LDS Church". Note to say that "church" is also informal for the Church.

3: see 1.

4: see 1 and 2.

5: I wanted to keep the image in other site of the article but seemed that the image doesn't exists in Wikimedia Commons. As I added the image in Primary (LDS) article.

6: see 2.

7: see 1 (in the External links I didn't removed "LDS Church" or "Mormon Church").

8: wikilink that is not seen.

9: already discussed it to you and you haven't replied.

10: Mormonism article is about all the doctrine in the Latter Day Saint movement, not the doctrine of Church.

All those edits were fine, I don't see they are a problem. Furawi (talk) 15:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, all those edits are not fine, regardless of whether or not you see the problem. Why are you so intent on removing terms like "LDS Church" when they are the most convenient/specific and accepted way to refer to the church? ~Awilley (talk) 03:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Awilley You are the only one who is complaining about my edits, the other administrator, and editors in overall are fine about those edits (except the 10, I admit that was a rushed edition and it has to be discussed in the talk page) that's why you are the one who has to talk, I tried to discuss it with you in your talk page but you never answered, then you revert me again and you mention to don't do "edit war" and talk it but again, you don't wanna talk, but in this conversation you ask me why "are you so intent on removing terms like 'LDS Church' when they are the most convenient/specific and accepted way to refer to the church?", but ignore why I did, see 2, and all the other things I said, I'm not removing LDS Church in a person article related to the Church or anything, the article I'm doing these edits are the specific Church articles, because is redundant, and convenient to who? To the newspapers haters of the Church? Or the Ex-Latter-day Saint people? Or the articles wrote before 2018? There's a lot of people that use the complete name of the Church, seems like you are the one who doesn't follow WP:NPOV because using "LDS Church" is anti-Church, and use "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint" or "the Church" is pro-Church, but in Wikipedia we have to be neutral, and the best way for that I think is simply use "church". Furawi (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also maybe you haven't noticed but in the Template:Latter-day Saints, there's other stuff and not related to the problem you wanna aboard, but you continue reverting it without considering the other stuff. And what do you mean "it's weird to call it the 'Holy Bible' in Wikipedia's voice", is just the name of a religious book, that is the name that the Church uses, it doesn't matter if its weird for you, the word Holy is used in many article titles. But again, I already discussed this in your talk page and you never answered. Furawi (talk) 05:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Bible Videos" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bible Videos has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 12 § Bible Videos until a consensus is reached. ~Awilley (talk) 04:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]