User talk:Funneh bruh

Funnehbruh

Wassup bro

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to KSWB-TV has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: KSWB-TV was changed by Funneh bruh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961224 on 2020-07-22T19:22:54+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to KSWB-TV. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 0qd (talk) 19:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:69420 (Number)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:69420 (Number), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:43, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:15, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Funneh bruh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only vandalised once with one warning and have moved in since then. I have a couple articles on this issue and it seems that this block was wrong, if I have read incorrectly please do confirm. Thank you.Funneh bruh (talk) 01:11, 23 July 2020 (EEST)

Decline reason:

Why were you editing the user pages of accounts blocked years ago? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That was my old account from 2017. Funneh bruh (talk) 22:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting us know. Talk page access blocked like that one was. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 23:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]