User talk:FungiFriendly

This is FungiFriendly's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plicaturopsis crispa has been accepted

Plicaturopsis crispa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clitocybula ellipsospora

In the referenced material it states Clitocybula ellipsospora is proposed as a new species based on morphological (macro- and microscopic) and molecular characters. Can you provide reliable secondary sources that confirm that it has been recognised as a separate species. Dan arndt (talk) 09:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan arndt would an index fungorium entry be enough, im not aware of any research other than the describing paper, and all news articles are referencing the original paper. FungiFriendly (talk) 09:12, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I asked the question, as I did a quick search online and everything came back to the same source. I looked at Index Fungorum but it also appears to reference the same authors. If you can find something independent confirming the recognition of the species I'd be happy to review the draft. Dan arndt (talk) 09:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan arndt thanks ive got an alert up so hopefully if something turns up I'll be able to update FungiFriendly (talk) 09:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clitocybula ellipsospora has been accepted

Clitocybula ellipsospora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ⁺ ^c 23:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Mycological Association (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't quite meet WP:NORG, we'd need to see secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Mycological Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:49, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FungiFriendly! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:49, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Mycological Association (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough significant, independent coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Mycological Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Mycological Association has been accepted

European Mycological Association, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 21:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FungiFriendly. Thank you for your work on European Mycological Association. Ldm1954, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I think it is OK to have short pages on scientific organisations such as this.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 21:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FungiFriendly. Thank you for your work on European Mycological Association. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for starting the page; concise and well-referenced, even if some of the referencing is rather close to the association itself.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]