Jump to content

User talk:FufuTofu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hi FufuTofu, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Good luck, and have fun. Eqdoktor 17:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please add edit summaries

[edit]

Hi Wikipedian. Thanks for your contributions. It would be really helpful if you would use edit summaries so that the other editors can see at what you've done.--Teddey 23:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Say Smile

[edit]

--Jupiter12 23:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia section in articles about living persons.

[edit]

Just so you know, articles about living people are not supposed to have trivia sections. I suggest reading WP:BLP for more information. Thanks! :) Acalamari 22:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions in Wikipedia! Regarding the article Never Again (Kelly Clarkson song), it's fine as it is, and the only mistakes were noted by you in the article's talk page. Besides, your changes are not cited by a source, and the sentences are awkward and very hard to understand. The errors will be fixed, but your changes will be reverted again. If you have any more concerns regarding the article, post them on my talk, and we might even agree to compromise on a Background section which can be approved by the both of us. Thank you in advance. Bull Borgnine 18:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

[edit]

Never Again Background Resolution

[edit]

Hello again FufuTofu, and thanks for replying! I have smiled at you, since most people are agressive after they have disagreed, but you have decided to compromise. You did the right thing. First I want to put this clear, YOU are the professional, so...ya, I really don't know anything unless people post information. I only edit what people post so it reads better and it's easy to understand. Now that you got your sources, I truly agree with you. But, you also had to read the MTV article. Here's a quote from it:

"Never Again almost didn't make Clarkson's forthcoming album, My December (see "Kelly Clarkson Blowing Off 'Bubblegum Ear Candy' On New LP"). She wrote it two years ago as a counterpoint to Breakaway's "Since U Been Gone" and "Behind These Hazel Eyes." Both of those songs and videos reflected her breakup with ex-Evanescence member David Hodges — with one song expressing her relief, another her pain — but neither was originally written with that subject matter in mind (they were tweaked to address it after the fact)." ~ MTV News

"Since U Been Gone" was inspired according to MTV News, even if she didn't write, it was adjusted to express the end of their relationship. Also here, the article was made in 2007, and according to the article, the song was written two years ago, so that is 2007-2= 2005. But then, your sources tell it's 2004. Both sources are reliable, and it will be difficult determining which is right, and that's beyond what I can do. You are right about "Where Is Your Heart" being inspired by the breakup, so how about we do this... Let's post the three songs on the background page. The year will stay at 2004, since you have an INTERVIEW and that's better than a typed article, which just says two years ago and it's not specific about the year.

Also, the two sentences are not related, so you are right, to the point I think "... totally different place when I wrote it..." sentence is not necessary. So how about we just delete that sentence? The sentence refering the song as "nasty" is fine and important, and it should stay in the Background section. I guess that fixes the Background section. Please reply if you think this is a good resolution, and thank you for cooperating with me. Also, don't worry about the comments, but next time make sure you click the + button to add a comment in my talk page. Thanks in advance. Bull Borgnine 22:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]