User talk:Ftiercel

Welcome!

Hello, Ftiercel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Tikiwont 12:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tora and Qt

Hi. I removed the tora link from the Qt article previously, because I don't think it was wellknown enough. The list of application is only a short list of the most popular applications known to use Qt, not a complete list of all Qt-applications. Please tell my why Tora qualifies? Carewolf 11:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think that TOra is more wellknown than programs like Opera or Scribus but perhaps I'm wrong. Ftiercel 14:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will not remove it again soon. I have never heard of it, but that doesn't prove anything. Carewolf 20:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poker face

We cannot use youtube as a reference beacuse if copyright wiolations. Please read WP:RS for more info. If you can find a reliable source for adding the info, go ahead. Regards --Legolas!! ^(talktome) 05:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ! I have changed the link :) Ftiercel (talk) 05:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again i removed your sample becuase blogs are again not reliable sources. Hence unacceptable. --Legolas!! ^(talktome) 09:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. But the source you used isn't reliable, no info there stating "Poker Face" has some elements that are sampled. If its true, its also an original research. We need to find a reliable source that confirms it. --Efe (talk) 12:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice page

Hi. Nice Comparison of speech synthesizers page. Could you consider adding Japplis Speech to your page? Thanks, Anthony 85.144.112.4 (talk) 12:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

list of optical character recognition software

Hello,
I see that in 2009 you copied the section OCR software into its own article. When doing so, it is important to link to the source page's history, like this; if the source page contains any copyrightable information or original content, this is required for compliance purposes. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
Bwrs (talk) 16:44, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Ftiercel (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hardcore (Electronic dance music) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

DJ Davyd, DJ Kirin, DJ La Carotte, Atomic Compressor, King Smoke, The Killer Clowns, LKJ, PatCash (with their label (Gangstar Toons Industry<ref name="energyflash"/>, 1994), DJ Olive, [[Manu le

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hardcore (Electronic dance music), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Masochism and Thunderdome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Hey there! Saw you added a lot of Audiotool tracks onto Wikipedia as examples. That's really cool, keep up whatcha doing! :D Thanks for the contribution on my overly-abandoned Wikia wiki, too! Cheers! Potasmic (talk) 15:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The next step is that other people also add tracks on Wikipedia. However, Audiotool is lacking fidget house, eurodance, uk hard house, hard trance, NRG and breakbeat hardcore... Ftiercel (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, looks like Binksternet removed them, because he claimed that they are NOT reliable sources, as per WP:V. Here's the proof: Binksternet#Removal of sourced content. --DimaLeon2000 (talk) 12:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Binksternet has already explained this. Ftiercel (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ishkur's Guide

Hi Ftiercel. Thanks for the work you have been doing on electronic music articles. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music went to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and it was decided that it was not a reliable source and was removed. I cannot find the link at the moment, but you might want to know this before you add it to any more electronic music articles. I will look out the link when I have more time. All the best.--SabreBD (talk) 19:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive house

Hi there. Why did you remove the samples from this article and replace them with unknown artists? Don't you think it would of been better to have a discussion about it first? - Shiftchange (talk) 06:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Shiftchange: Hi. Non-free content should only be used when they can't be replaced by open content. Those three tracks are CC-BY-SA-3.0 and can be included in a 100% free-licenced version of Wikipedia (and on Wikipedia in another language too). They don't need to be notable as they are not a subject of an article and they help to understand the subject. Morever, they also can be modified using their source project. Ftiercel (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest the new songs do not have the same effect. They aren't equivalent. They are poor examples. They aren't representative. I would also suggest the hysteria with using a small audio clip for song samples is beyond a joke. The ridiculously small image size for game screenshots is another example. The article conveys much less meaning now for no good reason. It would be better if editors stood up for fair use and helped suppress copyright. - Shiftchange (talk) 09:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I barely understand your english. Do you want to say "I would suggest" or "I would say"? What do you mean by "the ridiculously small image size for game screenshots"? I don't understand "the hysteria with using a small audio clip for song samples is beyond a joke". Also, "it would of been" is not a correct english term. "it would have been" is a correct one. Can you reiterate what you said? Ftiercel (talk) 07:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of uploaded works

Hey Ftiercel,

I'd be really great if you have a list of tracks on Audiotool you've uploaded here. I'd like to include some onto my Userpage. Cheers, Potasmic (talk) 21:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Here is the list:

Ftiercel (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! That is quite harsh on your talk page haha. I'll move it to a page under your user page if you're fine with that! Potasmic (talk) 16:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your content in Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision museum exhibition

Good afternoon,

My name is Lotte Baltussen, and I work at the Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision. We are the archive of Dutch public broadcasters and hold many other types of audiovisual heritage as well. We have recently opened our new exhibition "3FM Presents: Your Serious Radio", which looks back at the last 50 years of pop music on the radio.

One of the interactives of our exhibition is a videomapping installation that depicts a teen room. When visitors enter the exhibition, they provide information that builds up their profile: their year of birth, gender and the favourite radio show, song, musical genre from their teens. This information is used to recreate their teen room; a sparse white space with 25 different elements such as a white bed, desk, and couch that are projected upon when a visitor activates his or her profile. We've divided the teen room into 10 time periods: 1965-1969, 1970-1974 and so forth.

In creating the videomapping, we have used countless free to use images, textures and patterns, among which is your Hardcore symbol upload. We'd like to thank you very much for making your content available and thus making it possible us to use it. You can find a complete overview of the content used here, a blog post about the whole process here and pictures of the videomapping here, so you can see your content in action.

Thanks again!

All best,

Lotte Belice (talk) 11:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should "Comparison of Unified Modeling Language tools" be the "default" page instead of "List of Unified Modeling Language tools"?

Greetings, you moved the page "List of Unified Modeling Language tools" and you gave the following reason for that move: "A comparison is more useful than a list", I agree with you. I read that here. Anyway the comparison redirects to the list and I believe it could be better if the list redirects to the comparison, I did not change the page to ask for your opinion about that. What do you think about that? Regards Jacobubus (talk) 19:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. Every comparison pages are formatted this way. I have never understood why is was called "list". It's sortable by criteria. Ftiercel (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ftiercel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ftiercel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who contribute to the Game Cloud has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians who contribute to the Game Cloud, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 07:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ftiercel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Your edit to Metabolomics has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hugging Face

Fabrice-TIERCELIN (Fabrice TIERCELIN) (huggingface.co) Here to upgrade space, add spaces features for video and multiple images animated AI. 46.191.177.219 (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]