Jump to content

User talk:Frunzedz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Toccata quarta. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Toccata quarta (talk) 17:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Frunzedz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Comparison of top chess players throughout history may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • points for each 1 place, 5 - 2nd place, 4 - 3rd place, 3 - 4th place, 2 - 5th place, 1 - 6th place).<br />
  • | 24 || [Michael Tal]] || 2705 || 0 || 2 || 18 || 7

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

I apologize for the personal attack; it is not for me to tell you what and what not to do. I have tried to remove the table User:Toccata quarta has been maintaining and he has reverted me. I cannot in good faith stop you from adding your statistics if he refuses to remove his, because I believe they are both unencyclopedic for the same reason. Cobblet (talk) 23:15, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, forgive me as well for aggressive response. I accept your point about unencyclopedic content, so will not try to burden the article with more unacceptable content.Frunzedz (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]