User talk:Fruitynut

~~== March 2009 ==~~

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to RAF Scampton, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: RAF Scampton was changed by Fruitynut (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-04T02:15:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Labrador Retrievers. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Labrador Retrievers was changed by Fruitynut (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-04T02:33:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Important Please Note

I have had a look at some of the edits by this Editor, and as far as I can see, they are NOT vandalism. This is the dogs name - Nigger (dog) - A Historical Fact. There are no racial tones here and the dog was greatly loved by his master. Both Dog and Master are famous. --BSTemple (talk) 08:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It seems to be a knee jerk reaction to revert the addition of the link without bothering to look and see if the link might be valid. I have struck out the warnings above, and you should feel free to remove them at any time. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Fruitynut! I am CambridgeBayWeather and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User:Jimbo Wales has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -- Menti fisto 22:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Jimbo Wales. Versus22_talk 22:48, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit-warring, violation of WP:3RR, block evasion, continued personal attacks. You need to realise that things move at their own pace here, not yours, and will not be pushed by abuse.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 00:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Drummer Dick's Discharge

The article Drummer Dick's Discharge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:27, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]