Jump to content

User talk:Fruhvvb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Fruhvvb! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 13:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Thanks for all the 101 pix

[edit]

I reverted 2 or 3, which I considered to be too dark. We can find a 3rd opinion if you'd like. But let me say "Please keep on trying. We need lots of good photos, and it just takes a bit of time to get used to the way pix look and work in Wikipedia." Thanks again. Smallbones(smalltalk) 00:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SEPTA stations

[edit]

Hi Fruhvvb, thanks for your help on SEPTA station articles. Several editors have been having a conversation on my talk page here about which names to use when further disambiguation is necessary. The consensus seems to be to use (SEPTA) where it's available, and to use the line's name when something more precise is required. The city or state would be used mainly if the station serves multiple systems in addition to SEPTA.--Cúchullain t/c 19:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding on to this, please use the Requested Moves process when proposing possibly controversial page moves. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:39, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Island Avenue station

[edit]

The article Island Avenue station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The Island Avenue station appears to lack the requisite notability for a standalone article. See GEOFEAT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rebbing 23:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Little Portugal, Montreal. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. MTLskyline (talk) 02:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Fruhvvb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]