User talk:FrostFlower984
Welcome!
[edit]Hi FrostFlower984! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- thank you! FrostFlower984 (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Crypto Leaks
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Crypto Leaks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Phuzion (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry I made an edit on the page to add significance and I'm worried i may have accidentally deleted the speedy deletetion item? I'm not sure how. I apoogize if that's the case though. Or is that something that happens when you make an edit there? FrostFlower984 (talk) 15:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- No worries, it was an administrator that deleted the speedy deletion template, declining to perform the deletion. However... 2406:3003:2077:1E60:EDE9:C688:2C0C:D5F5 (talk) 10:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
September 2023
[edit]
Your edit to Crypto Leaks has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
Please don't copy text from sources directly into Wikipedia. 2406:3003:2077:1E60:EDE9:C688:2C0C:D5F5 (talk) 10:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I don't understand what you changed or why the changes as such are deleted rather than left in the record. The deletion log doesn't make it clear what was actually deleted. I thought everything was properly cited here FrostFlower984 (talk) 06:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi,
- From my recollection almost entire sentences were copied directly from the New York Times article, along with some close paraphrasing. That is a copyright violation; it does not matter if the source was cited or credited, as NYT hold copyright to that content and we do not have permission to use it.
- Due to legal considerations, the removal procedure involves expunging the history after the offending material has been removed. Unfortunately that means we're no longer able to see the offending content; I suppose that does make it harder to understand what you did wrong, but let me try to help give some idea.
- The article was flagged for attention by an automated process, so I ran it through the copyvio detection tool. You can see in the current version that it only marks a handful of phrases as identical copies, including a couple of direct quotes. By contrast, the in the deleted version, there was a large chunk of red highlights: almost all of the second paragraph was highlighted, as well as a smaller portion in the beginning of the third para.
- In general, removal of copyrighted content usually means outright deletion of the offending text, but in this case I performed a rewrite, and I did make an effort to preserve the same key points you'd originally included. I drew on the cointelegraph source as well to reduce the reliance on NYT, and expanded a bit for clarity. Please feel free to check and make adjustments.
- Also, thanks for catching the missing word "to" — I'd swear I had already fixed that, so I must have accidentally pasted an older draft when submitting.
- 2406:3003:2077:1E60:9A93:B121:D12:6203 (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oh what an interesting tool.
- Got it, Thanks for the help and for rewriting rather than deleting! I thought with citations it was ok. I'll keep that in mind about the copyright issues and citations! FrostFlower984 (talk) 08:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Crypto Leaks for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypto Leaks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.