User talk:Froome2017

Welcome!

Hello, Froome2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Daniel Kaluuya. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nonsuch Parkrun

The article Nonsuch Parkrun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be an event only of local significance. I cannot find any coverage of it in a broader area.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 13:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nonsuch Parkrun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nonsuch Parkrun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonsuch Parkrun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 19:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ollie Garrod

The article Ollie Garrod has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fram (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changing guidelines

Please don't change the meaning of guidelines, like you did here. If you want to propose a change, you can start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) and try to get consensus for your change. Fram (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was not aware of that. I will propose a discussion on the talk page. Thanks. Froome2017 (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of parkruns in the United Kingdom

Thank you for the barnstar! I have taken to parkrun tourism recently so it is also helping me find good runs! Szzuk (talk) 14:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, glad you are enjoying lots of different parkruns! I'm in the SW London/Surrey area, so lots to choose from! Froome2017 (talk) 14:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Froome2017. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Froome2017 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Sorry for the sockpuppeting. I did it for a laugh but I now realise this was wrong. I would like to be unblocked on this account as it is being used to help expand coverage of running. If you unblock me I will use Wikipedia for this purpose

Decline reason:

There's no reasonable chance anyone's going to unblock you given your behaviour, not in the immediate future. Your best bet is to refrain from editing and then apply under WP:SO in six months, accounting for your actions at that time and convincing us they'll never be repeated. Yamla (talk) 17:08, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Nonsuch Parkrun

Hello, Froome2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nonsuch Parkrun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 09:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Łódź 1" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Łódź 1 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26 § Łódź 1 until a consensus is reached. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 00:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]