User talk:Frog989238242

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frog989238242 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was blocked beacuse i changed victor olidipo team from the rocket to the pacers. i did not know that he was traded and i was trying to protect the site from vadalism. if unblocked i will make wikipedia 100% right and will prove teachers wrong. i did not mean to destroy the site and i should be unblocked. you should look into Jauerback beacause i should not have been block. please unblock me so i can fix wikipedia Frog989238242 (talk) 16:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your description of your edits is at odds with the filter log and your contribs issue. It is also not impressive that you accused the blocking admin of bad faith. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frog989238242 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry i was mistaken why i was blocked i now know. still though, i was blocked beacuse of two things one i accidently destroy a page i did not try to. second thing, i was blocked for was me saying there were 2 pogchamps. but their was 3. i also said that that pogchamp and pogchamps are differnt thing this is true and i should not be banned for it. if i did soomething so bad the AI would see it. they did not. please stop blocking everyone you find did something a litle wrong. WP:BITE needs to be upholded so you would be going away fron what you are an admin to do. "Frog989238242 (talk) 22:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There is a certain degree of competence that is required to edit here. Once you have gained the maturity and language skills necessary to communicate effectively and edit productively, you can be unblocked. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frog989238242 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have the skill to make wikipedia great that is disrespectful saying i do not. unblock me i have been disrespected by many admins so please show me that wikipedia is i place i should stay or i will leave. i was on it for 1 day and i was blocked for now reason please see above to see why should let me go and fix this broken place Frog989238242 (talk) 22:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 02:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frog989238242 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

okay i understand i did bad stuff but can you a least put a expire date on it. also ponyo the person who declined my apeal is now blocked also so if you are letting people who have been blocked block me then you are going to need help cleaning up wikipedia Frog989238242 (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Ponyo is not blocked. You are clearly demonstrating you lack sufficient competence to be unblocked. I am revoking your talk page access by protecting this page for six months. At that point, you may apply under WP:SO. Given your behaviour so far, you will have a high bar to clear to demonstrate you should be unblocked at that time. Yamla (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.