User talk:Friggit

Your edits to Drifting (motorsport)

Your edits - diff 1 diff 2 diff 3 diff 4 diff 5 diff 5 - are not suitable for an encyclopedia. You need to follow NPOV and WP:V, your edits are neither neutral nor verified. Cheers! RB30DE 23:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalising my contribution to the drifting page. What I've written is fact and is also neutral (I actually do love drifting myself but what I've contributed is fact). Drifting is actually not classed as a proper professiona motorsport and is not recognised by the FIA (the governing body for motorsports and safey). The motorsports like F1, WRC (Rally) and WTCC (Touring Car) are supported by the FIA, even Japanese Formula 3 and SuperGT have FIA safety approval, however drifting does NOT. The sport is looked down by professional race drivers and enthusiasts because it's such an amateurish event. Biased judging, over enthusiastic fanboys etc. In any case I'm sorry if I offended you. Nice username though, I do like Nissans, only 1 of them though, Fairlady Z series, except Z32.

Sources:

1] Drifting does not have FIA approval: http://www.fia.com/sport/Championships/2006.html

Thank you for your time.

No worries, I'm not offended. What you have added may be fact, but the point is you have to have a source for it, and you have to attribute it to someone else. You can't just write "Drifting itself is often frowned upon by professional motorsport enthusiasts as they feel many aspects of the sport are farcical such as biased judging, inexperienced participants, over-enthusiastic supporters (fanboys) and even the concept of drifting itself.". Wikipedia is not about facts/truth, it's about sources. I don't think the words "farcical", "biased", "inexperienced", & "fanboy" are neutral, but if you can ascribe those words to someone else, that's fine. Also when you are reverting, you are also adding back in David Green and some other spelling mistakes, not sure if that was your intention or not. Cheers! RB30DE 01:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

^ Thank you for fixing my contribution. I had no idea about the other spelling mistakes someone else left. I'll search around for professional motorsport personalities opinions on drifting. It's just a shame a TV interview isn't always recorded.

Thanks for not taking it personally! Yeah, if you find something you can quote, add it, something will turn up. I think I've seen that sort of opinion around too, but can't remember where. RB30DE 03:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

^ I noticed your screen name is that of a Nissan engine. Lately I've been looking into purchasing an old Commodore which uses this engine (strangely). A bit strange I know, did you ever own one of these cars. Perhaps we can share tips and such. It's only going to be a filler car. Are you Australian? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Friggit (talk • contribs) 10:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

A VL! No I never owned a Commodore. I'm from the other side of the ditch. Have you seen CalaisTurbo.com? RB30DE 11:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 18:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ford c1 platform.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford c1 platform.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]