User talk:Friendlyedits

'== Welcome and introduction == 'Bold text'--Friendlyedits (talk) 02:19, 14 November 2010 (UTC) Hi, Friendlyedits. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck! Chzz ► 02:00, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

['[image:Wikipe-tan_face.jpg|thumb|ようこそ]]'Bold text

You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people.

Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes.

Play in your user area. For example, create User:Friendlyedits/test.

Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009.

When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references.

Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page.

There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia!

-- Chzz ► 02:00, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

Proposed deletion of Katie Larmour

The article Katie Larmour has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katie Larmour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katie Larmour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Larmour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Less Unless (talk) 08:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My nomination

Hello! I am answering to your e-mail here as it's preferable that all the article-related communication takes place on Wikipedia. I have nominated the article you created Katie Larmour as in my opinion it doesn't meet the notability criteria set my the guidelines WP:N, WP:GNG. In order to be considered notable the subject should be covered by multiple independent reliable secondary sources in detail. This means that 5 of 6 sources provided on the page right now can't be used as they are user generated. Also EVERY statement in the biographies of living people should be backed by a source. After WP:BEFORE (research) I have found just 3 article in the same newspaper which are also barely usable. Therefore I believe the article should be deleted. If you can provide multiple independent reliable secondary sources that would speak about the subject in detail - please do add them to the article. Best,Less Unless (talk) 09:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]