User talk:Frgewhqwth

April 2013

Hello, Frgewhqwth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Valenciano (talk) 18:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrés Thomas Conteris, the discussion there is now closed and no edits should be made to the page. Thanks, Valenciano (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked further into that page. If you believe the redirect is fine, then just revert the page to the previous status, if other editors disagree they will change it back and then you should discuss on the article talkpage. If you believe the redirect is inappropriate then you should go to WP:RFD and nominate it for deletion, however the page I've listed above should not be used. Instead you should use AFD2 template. Valenciano (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Evelyn Kozak, you may be blocked from editing. Epeefleche (talk) 19:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of living supercentenarians, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Epeefleche (talk) 19:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of your edits at WP:ANI

Hey there. I don't know what exactly is going on, but I believe some oversight is needed; therefore, I have started a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Frgewhqwth and unsourced material. Please feel free to comment there. Thank you, —Ignatzmice ^talk _contribs 23:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Regarding your edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrés Thomas Conteris, the discussion there is now closed and no edits should be made to the page. Thanks, Valenciano (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked further into that page. If you believe the redirect is fine, then just revert the page to the previous status, if other editors disagree they will change it back and then you should discuss on the article talkpage. If you believe the redirect is inappropriate then you should go to WP:RFD and nominate it for deletion, however the page I've listed above should not be used. Instead you should use AFD2 template. Valenciano (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Evelyn Kozak, you may be blocked from editing. Epeefleche (talk) 19:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of living supercentenarians, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Epeefleche (talk) 19:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for Persistent addition of unsourced material to BLP articles, ignoring repeated warnings and engaging in personal attacks upon other editors, the most recent violation being this edit to Jeremy Glick, in which the editor addressed another editor by saying, "Fuck you, nightscream. There is a source. See the YouTube video added. Prick.". Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nightscream (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding to your last edit summary, putting aside the fact that YouTube is not a very reliable source under WP:USERG, the YouTube video merely documents the interview. It does not make any mention of the relationship or lackthereof between the two Glicks. If it did, then why do you keep including a citation needed tag after the phrase "also lost his life"? You don't add unsourced material with a citation needed tag. You include an accompanying citation, or you don't add it.

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies before deciding whether editing here is something for you. If you need help or have questions about editing, feel free to ask me, once your block expires. Nightscream (talk) 23:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE I have extended the block to editing of this talk page, because Frgewhqwth abused this ability by blanking the block notice placed on this page. While he is free to do this after the block has expired, it is inappropriate to do this while the block is in effect, since a transparent record of his violations, warnings and blocks needs to be available to other members of the community who may visit this page. Nightscream (talk) 02:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your afd

I'm looking at the AfD you started at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasquale Cafaro, and was wondering if you performed a wp:before search.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:54, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]