User talk:Freyno

A note

Re this: [1]. Your input is appreciated, but edit wars are never "necessary." Acroterion (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, edit wars, like real wars, can indeed be necessary. If we cannot settle on a consensus, then we must re-instate the previous lede decided upon by consensus. That is in the rules, and this WILL cause an edit war in this instance. However, if we cannot decide on consensus, we must push on with it regardless.

So yes, edit wars can indeed be necessary, as it is in this case. If an edit war will ensue when you do what the rules command us to, if it is inevitable when ensuring that an article is created to the finest standard, then YES, an edit war is necessary. Freyno (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the comments you've made above and at Talk:C.S. Lewis, you may expect to be blocked without further warning if you proceed, as it's clear that you're not new to WP and that you know that edit-warring is not acceptable. You presumably also know that personal attacks against other editors are unacceptable: any repetition will result in sanctions. Acroterion (talk) 15:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be blocked as I have done nothign wrong.

Edit warring is sometimes necessary, and therefore, sometimes forgiveable and acceptable.

I have not made personal attacks against anyone. Please get your facts straight.

There is no behaviour to change, so no sanctions will be taken. End of discussion really. Freyno (talk) 02:38, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PowerSane for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Mo ainm~Talk 17:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]