User talk:Fresternoch/Archive 2

Tennis updates

I noticed that you were doing some tennis updates and that's great, many articles need them. Some of your updates don't follow protocol so I thought I'd mention them here so I don't have to correct them in future articles. On Performance timelines, if a player (like Rod Laver) has a detailed timeline on his career statistics page, the main page timeline is just the basic Grand Slam events.... really nothing more. Instances of "world No. 1" should be done in that style with lower case world and upper case No. In heading, whether section headings or table headings, usually only the first word is capitalized unless it is a proper noun. So "Grand Slam", but "French Open final" and "Early career." Also, no scores are allowed in prose. Like I said it will help me in doing corrections later. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I thought for all kinds of titles the first letter for every word excluding words like "on", "of", "in", etc. should be capitalized. Thanks for the reminder, I will keep it in mind for my future edits. Also for Rod Laver the graph in his career stats page was pretty much the exact same as the one on the main article though, last time I checked. Fresternoch (talk)

Yeah, at wikipedia we do not capitalize all the words of titles... only the proper nouns/names. I noticed today that you created a performance timeline for jrs. Per consensus guidelines they are not allowed. That info should be written as prose. The guideline can be found right here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I found a lot of other articles that has the timeline for juniors. Then I checked the guidelines you provided, and I checked the history to see that you added that rule yourself on October 8, 2013 without a reason provided at all as seen on the history of the page. Since the table isn't a massive size, usually 4 columns at most (and that's a rarity) and always 5 rows, and I also checked the talk page of the guidelines, where I found nothing regarding to the change you made, in fact I did not find a single "junior" on the page, I don't see why this shouldn't be allowed. And all the performance timeline discussions on the talk page I found wasn't remotely connected to stop allowing junior performance timeline tables. So I reverted your edit because I am confident that I have a right and clear reason to do so. Fresternoch (talk)

No it was a clarification of consensus. We do not allow a jr timeline in our articles. Bring it to talk if you want a change. The timeline does not allow tournaments below a certain grade to be in the main timeline or in separate timelines. It was discussed. Jr's is even below futures so I'm guessing some editor back in 2013 didn't realize that so I clarified it. We don't use them, and when we see them we remove them. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask where, when and how was this consensus established? I want definite proof of this "consensus", not just a personal preference as I have seen so far. If I do get the proof and if it is good enough, I will consider about it. If it is not enough, I will bring this topic to the talk page. If there isn't an existing consensus, then I will just keep doing what I believe that is right. Fresternoch (talk)

I'm not going to dig through all the talk pages. It is an established long-standing guideline to keep out lesser events. Please, go ahead and bring it up at the project talk page if you'd like to change it. That's exactly what the talk page is for, and we welcome discussions. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're also putting the cart before the horse here. The standard practice at wikipedia is to try and add new material and if it gets reverted to bring it to the article talk page. You do not keep on adding something against our established guidelines without then convincing others. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all you did not convince me that this change of rule you made is not a personal preference. I read through the guideline history and the talk page and I did not find anything new based on my discoveries that I mentioned above. Tell me a few of the talk pages you mentioned above and I will dig through it myself if you do not want to do so yourself, although that shouldn't be what one should do when trying to convince another. Fresternoch (talk)

August 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Guillermo Coria. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It has been explained to the editor that this is a longstanding guideline of WikiProject Tennis, and he has been given the proper guideline link. It is now being labeled as disruptive and will be handed off to an administrator. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Costa career statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Juan Martín del Potro tennis season

I understand your point of not wanting to link till it's complete but I'm not sure about that. Anyone can edit the articles to make them better and the original creator stopped his editing in June. It seems to me that it would have 1000% more likelihood of being found by other editors if it was linked from the 2009 section of Del Porto main article. We get a lot of stub tennis articles created in hopes of getting other editors involved, but they have to find them. Basically all someone has to do it remove about 80% of what in the 2009 section of the main article and transfer to the 2009 article. Any thoughts on that? Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What I was thinking is that I want to see if Markreal can get it done, because he was the only one doing the work since the creation of the article a few months back, if not (I would say that we should wait for a few more weeks), we can link it from there to see if anyone else can finish it. I don't think it is anything that should be considered in priority right now since the content of the article is not currently happening. I think your idea of moving info from main to the 2009 article is on point, but I propose we wait to see if he gets it done since he is still active. What do you think? Fresternoch (talk)

I don't mind waiting a few weeks until it's complete, but I may not wait at the 2009 article for him to complete it. I may do some of it myself if I have some time. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I'll definitely help too when I am available. Fresternoch (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robin Söderling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Slam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing News #3—2016

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter • Subscribe or unsubscribe on the English Wikipedia

Did you know?

Did you know that you can easily re-arrange columns and rows in the visual editor?

Select a cell in the column or row that you want to move. Click the arrow at the start of that row or column to open the dropdown menu (shown). Choose either "Move before" or "Move after" to move the column, or "Move above" or "Move below" to move the row.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has mainly worked on a new wikitext editor. They have also released some small features and the new map editing tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the list of work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, releasing the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving language support.

Recent changes

You can now set text as small or big.[1]
Invisible templates have been shown as a puzzle icon. Now, the name of the invisible template is displayed next to the puzzle icon.[2] A similar feature will display the first part of hidden HTML comments.[3]
Categories are displayed at the bottom of each page. If you click on the categories, the dialog for editing categories will open.[4]
At many wikis, you can now add maps to pages. Go to the Insert menu and choose the "Maps" item. The Discovery department are adding more features to this area, like geoshapes. You can read more on MediaWiki.org.[5]
The "Save" button now says "Save page" when you create a page, and "Save changes" when you change an existing page.[6] In the future, the "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.
Image galleries now use a visual mode for editing. You can see thumbnails of the images, add new files, remove unwanted images, rearrange the images by dragging and dropping, and add captions for each image. Use the "Options" tab to set the gallery's display mode, image sizes, and add a title for the gallery.[7]

Future changes

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining 10 "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next month. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including Thai, Burmese and Aramaic.

The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. The 2017 wikitext editor will look like the visual editor and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices in October 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.

Let's work together

Do you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce.

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not predict the future on Wikipedia

Hello. Please note that "news from the future" are unacceptable on Wikipedia. Never report the future as history, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. On 16 October, you cannot enter 17 October as the current ranking date in tennis infoboxes. The current ranking date is 10 October, the next update will happen on 17 October. But until it happens, it has not happened, so if you want to add tomorrow's ranking on Wikipedia, you have to wait until tomorrow (it does not matter if the ranking update is projected, expected to happen). Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder. Please note that reporting future dates as history is forbidden on Wikipedia. Always wait for the official (not projected, "live", expected) ranking updates. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fresternoch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]