User talk:FreshisFresh

December 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to WLIF has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: WLIF was changed by FreshisFresh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.991769 on 2013-12-27T17:23:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tyler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tyler was changed by FreshisFresh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980424 on 2013-12-27T17:24:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Doorstop, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Doorstop was changed by FreshisFresh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951475 on 2013-12-27T17:25:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Aerus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Aerus was changed by FreshisFresh (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2013-12-27T17:27:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FreshisFresh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I went to the store while I forgot to log out, and my five-year old son was playing around. I did not do anything. Please consider unblocking.

Decline reason:

See WP:EBUR. I'm impressed by your son's ability to use phrases like "not available at this time" at such a young age. only (talk) 17:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FreshisFresh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

made a mistake, my son was typing random things, I wanted to rephrase a paragraph but when I got back I couldn't and I asked my son what did you do? he said "I was playing around". Please consider unblocking me.

Decline reason:

We get a lot of people who are blocked telling us that their brother, or roommate, or child did the vandalism while they weren't paying attention. However, if you're unable to secure your account to such an extent that other people can use it to make vandalism edits, it ends up not mattering whether your personal intentions were good or not: vandalism is coming through this account, and this account is being used by more than one person. Both of those are over the line and would lead to a block in and of themselves. Together, they mean that your block is definitely not going to be lifted until you can address both of those aspects - convince a reviewing administrator both that this account will never, ever vandalize again and that you have secured your account so that no one but you will be able to use it. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.