User talk:Fresh Prince Carlton

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stormin' Foreman 00:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor Series 2007 new location

Not trying to antagonize at all. Just seemed funny to me that two users take comments made a few months ago so seriously. Honestly Wikipedia gets edited thousands of times a day with dozens of reputable editors contributing to the Pro Wrestling Wikiproject. Don't you think someone would have already changed the location back to Montreal if the event were still being held there? Not only that but after there being a source cited in the article itself about the new location of the event you didn't even bother to see it and still reverted the article. Just try to be more careful next time. Cheers. -- bulletproof ^3:16 18:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article noms

Please stop nominating wrestling-related articles for FA status without first consulting WP:PW. It is best to withdraw the nominations for both World Wrestling Entertainment and Shawn Michaels. Post a comment on User talk:Raul654 that you would like to withdraw the nominations, and he'll close the debates. Thanks. Nikki311 17:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Regarding your comments on Talk:Puppy mill: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. See the comment I left at the discussion Ipatrol (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to WWE Extreme Rules, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Stop adding "Extreme Rules" to the match types. 1)WWE is not calling them that. 2)All of the matches be default are under Extreme Rules and thus its redundant (i.e. you would say "No Disqualification Triple Threat match" TJ Spyke 03:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NFL standings

The official NFL standings page doesn't use and has never used a "games back" column. I've also never seen it used in any official source. And it's only useful to people who can't do simple subtraction. DragonFury (talk) 22:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NFL.com: http://www.nfl.com/standings

PS. As Eagles 24/7 noted on my talk page, the non-mobile version of espn.com also doesn't use a "games back." The only reason the mobile one does is because some programmer got lazy and just copied/pasted the MLB table. DragonFury (talk) 22:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do I see that stat in Madden games and on TV? Specifically when they are showing a teams chances during the last few games of the season? And if you follow by the simple subtracting logic, then what is the point of showing that the Lions are out, when someone can do simple math to figure it out? And it's not on a stat sheet anyways. Fresh Prince Carlton (talk) 22:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Madden nor TV are credible sources. Until the NFL changed the rules Madden got the coin toss procedure wrong for crying out loud. Not to mention the fact that none of the previous standings templates on Wikipedia have ever used a GB stat. And for good measure here are 3 links where GB is nowhere in sight:DragonFury (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC) NFL.com: http://www.nfl.com/standings ESPN.com: http://espn.go.com/nfl/standings SI.com: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/standings/?eref=sinav[reply]

Fine, if we follow your logic, get rid of it, and the info dagger stating they are out of the playoffs next to the Carolina Panthers and Lions, as they are useless stats too according to your logic. Fresh Prince Carlton (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Playoff eligibility is quite a bit more complicated then simple games back. There's tiebreakers & a team's remaining schedule to consider. It also involves the records of teams not in the same division, which may not be readily apparent. Games back is nothing more then the difference in games won. DragonFury (talk) 22:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gronkowski

While it appears it didn't happen yet today officially, it was not speculation and the coach does not have to announce it for it to be true. Teams go over 54 all the time while we wait to find the counter move, so yes, you can go over 54, but only temporarily. No reason to yell in your edit summary, man. Chill, haha. Cheers,--Giants27(T|C) 23:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well it seems it hasn't happened yet, that he just came in for a workout and Butler was released and a LB was signed. So, I still think he should be removed. From my past experiences, Wikipedia does not tolerate adding speculative items. Fresh Prince Carlton (talk) 00:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Bolden

The Brandon Bolden to the 'Skins article was false, Bleacher Report is not a reliable source. --75.213.250.238 (talk) 02:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bleacher Report is a reliable source. Please remove him Fresh Prince Carlton (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Patriots numbers

No problem. For reference, see how almost every team in the league has doubles somewhere on the roster. RevanFan (talk) 02:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WWEI question

Hello, Fresh Prince Carlton. You have new messages at Wcquidditch's talk page.
Message added 20:46, 8 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WWEI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHYN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenbrell Thompkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IR players

I understand how the waived/injured rule works, but it appears that quite a few players who were listed on the website as being on the IR are no longer there. For example, I remember patriots.com listed Quentin Hines there but he's gone now. They may have been released with injury settlements. Elijah (talk) 21:03, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am checking with Chris Price of WEEI if it looks right. He has all the listings. We should leave it the way it is until I find out Fresh Prince Carlton (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a source that refutes the evidence you put up http://www.nfl.com/transactions?transactionMonth=&transactionYear=&transactionTeamAbbr=NE&prevTransactionMonth=0&prevTransactionYear=0&prevTransactionTeamAbbr= Fresh Prince Carlton (talk) 21:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, looks good. I guess it's important to remember that the official site isn't run by the team and can be wrong. Elijah (talk) 21:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That roster is always sparsely updated. The depth chart on the Patriots website is out of wack too all the time Fresh Prince Carlton (talk) 22:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]