User talk:Freiamann

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krizpo. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:52, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Freiamann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is unfair. If you didn't notice, I used legitimate 100% proven sources on the statements I made about religion in South Korea. Over 50% of you admins are probably American, and 90% of you americans on wiki are fanatical christians with only one agenda. I request an unblock, as it was difficult to request an unblock on my previous account. I actually sent an unblock appeal with a following statement: If I was unblocked, I would still be editing articles related to religion. But with 100% proven reliable sources. No wonder people are increasingly using other sources on their schoolwork. Wikipedia has begun to have a reputation as unreliable as many articles regarding countries are old, 2006, 2007 etc. Did you guys even check my edits on South Korea?

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abusive sockpuppet of User:Krizpo. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have no choice--you may only request unblock from Krizpo. Period. Did we check your edits? Yes, enough to know that they are you. You are blocked. You cannot edit until you are unblocked. To do that, you're going to have to explain how you will stop doing the stuff that got you blocked before. And, as you've apparently forgotten, your problem was only partially reliable sources--the main problem is your repeated, unceasing, painful violation of WP:NPOV, especially WP:UNDUE. I'll let another admin formally decline this, but you cannot be unblocked except through Krizpo. If your unblock there was declined, it means that the admin reviewing the request believed you were going to continue causing disruption. Until you understand and promise to stop the disruption, you may not edit Wikiepdia. Period. And every time you sock, you make it less likely that someone will unblock you. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:52, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]