User talk:Freezeflame19

First Section

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Freezeflame19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for vandalizing those pages and I won't do that any more. Instead, I will add information to articles and research topics online so if their Wikipedia pages are missing information, I can add the information I find online to the articles here. Can I please be unblocked? Freezeflame19 (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access reinstated

As you requested at UTRS appeal #41335, I have reinstated your talk page access. This is solely so you can follow the process outlined at template:2nd chance and then request an unblock. Any other use, including removing or editing the existing declined unblock request, will result in your talk page access being revoked again. --Yamla (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-revoked your talk page access, as per Jpgordon from 2021-03-13. Your copyright violation, by copying content from filmibeat.com, was inappropriate and in no way would have been suitable per the 2nd chance template. --Yamla (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for giving back my talk page access. I think I'll work on the proposed article on another site and post it here when it's done so there won't be any more copyright issues here. And I will put all the information in my own words. Freezeflame19 (talk) 11:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As per your email request, I have reinstated your talk page access. This is the *absolute last time*. In addition to following the 2nd chance and addressing your vandalism, you'll now also need to address your copyright violation. Please answer the questions raised at User:Yunshui/decline copyvio and I want to be very, very, very clear here, answer those questions in your own words, *without copying information* from elsewhere on Wikipedia. A reminder, your edits from a few hours ago were totally inappropriate and in no way could those edits have possibly resulted in a successful unblock under the 2nd-chance template. So, you once again have talk page access. You need to commit zero instances of copyright infringement, you need to follow the 2nd-chance template to find reliable sources to add well-researched material to an article (which you were most definitely not doing before), then you need to address your vandalism and copyright infringement. You are walking a razor's edge here, *every single edit* you've made so far has been inappropriate and some of them have placed the entire Wikipedia project in jeopardy. You have one final chance to show you have learned your lesson. Any repeat of your previous behaviour and you are done. --Yamla (talk) 11:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Questions (Complete)

What is copyright? Copyright is the right of a creator of any written or picture piece of property

How is Wikipedia licenced? It is licensed under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License, the Creative Commons lisence, and the GFDL

Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? The content on Wikipedia is intended to be freely editable by anyone, which is not allowed to copyrighted work unless permission is given.

Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? If it's reliable and if we put the info into our own words while properly crediting the original source

How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? By giving full credit to every sourcI use and putting all information into my own words.

Put Article Proposal Here

I plan to create an article about an amusement park ride. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheetah_Chase_(ride)

I picked this ride because it is a red link in the article about the amusement park and one of my interests is amusement park rides.

Draft for New Unblock Request

unblock|Hello, I am asking that my current block be lifted so I can add constructive information, as I did in my proposed article above. I realize now that this is a serious project which has no room for random letters or words, and I will not add those kinds of edits here ever again. I will also obey all of the rules about copyright here. I hope I have sufficiently demonstrated my understanding of copyright issues in my answers to the questions above. Thank you. Freezeflame19 (talk) 02:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]