User talk:Freeman501

Welcome!

Hello, Freeman501, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 13:13, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow... I've only been editing Wikipedia for six years and now I get a welcome :-) Freeman501 (talk) 18:07, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Preston North End F.C.

Hi there - thanks for your recent edits to try and tidy up this article - unfortunately though, you have changed all the cases of "Preston are", "the club were", etc. to "Preston is", "the club was", etc. This is incorrect, because the article uses British English (it's tagged at the top of the page), and entities such as football clubs are referred to using the plural in British English - please see WP:PLURALS for further information. I hope you can fix up the wayward edits, as the rest of your work is very good, but it was all done as one big edit, so it can only be undone en masse. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. --DaveG12345 (talk) 17:57, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hildebert and Everwin

Hello Freeman501. I left my (admittedly vague) response at the talk page. Thanks for your interest in the article and for all your help. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I replied at my talk pager, to keep the conversation in one place. Best regards. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shuriken may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

There are also earlier mentions in written records, such as the ''Osaka Gunki'' (大阪軍記, (the military records of [[Osaka]]), of the standard knife and short sword being thrown in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hougoumont

No, I did not change it in this case (although I often fix obvious mistakes in grammar and spelling I make after an initial post -- it makes me look less illiterate than I really am!).

I agree with the hesitancy to use the Daily Mail as a citation, but that is different from using it on the talk page.

The reason why sources are essential goes back to the debate in 2005/2006. At that time it was a common sport among journalists to find something wrong in a Wikipedia article and publish this discovery in an article (lazy journalism) -- The response was that many editors agreed that something had to be done. One was to have more good quality articles "Wikipedia:100,000 feature-quality articles" the other was WP:BURDEN (which was added to WP:V in on 30 August 2005). It is "burden" that has lead to most of the huge improvement in the reliability of so many articles on Wikipedia. Which is why citations are so important.

The problem of "link rot" can often be fixed by using the wayback machine or something similar. For example see http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.projecthougoumont.com/introduction.html

As to citations. For what information to include see [WP:CITE#What information to include]]. Citations do not have to be put in using templates (see WP:CITE), but templates have three big advantages. The first is consistency in presentation, the second is that they can do a lot of validation on the information provided, and third the information can be parsed by bots that allows for other types of improvements in the future.

The documentation provided by {{Citation}} {{cite web}} and {{harvnb}} explain how to use them. Why {{Citation}} and also {{cite book}} etc, because two different groups of editors originally developed two slightly different citation template families and members of those groups tend to be proprietorial.

In this case if you decide to add the [1] as a citation. I will reformat it if I think it needs it. This will allow you to see a before and after example, which should help you understand how to do add them in future. -- PBS (talk) 15:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]